Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:413:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 19csp2323184pxp; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 12:54:04 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzwfy/Y9U4CVpu8hTEpbVQjkNEB7B7yPWsd8xxz23OclbBio5KPQQtIqL4ZUpv05IwFERym X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2303:b0:151:d02f:44c with SMTP id d3-20020a170903230300b00151d02f044cmr13365357plh.139.1646686444094; Mon, 07 Mar 2022 12:54:04 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1646686444; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zS0yWYoB/Be9YtciTHp+eFNirUOZ8KbtwxhjLgzL0M+NGi9iIBCwKHYFeoDs1HJNCu +GHGTyoCTW1M8v/1heVms/k3eRFp6wy9fg3u81coIMqlUrVSOd4h+tDuhrOtlUz8h1Bs m/JbgYAvqtflPyIWPHIXV4IYXVMNXdOGw15TdjPOVd+TxhY2dlM3NitHKP9S9ojZgYxq /4IJWNqS/h47VUAMr54IsXM5Ft9nILw3e7+/PAlQG3BOkTdhLLtcDIYTDvkTZNV3o21g A9bvWNeRWFAa7x86sH+OJdKHlIGrKkSf6+Q1L5tOMdrxQWC+LQSVVdCE/zNNBJMiqk0d Z8Tw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=HRWYQj6ygSui15Ezjgo123BR8/QmAv/FWR5OuEvV+NI=; b=LI0TYq8xK9EmYMcFyjDA1NcmiaOza1vLQKSiZeCuyMgx0C037Vy2aOkzIMiI6XtMDf Y6T2FiNLEBSe0ydKtxC+DwQcsCLVe3nxD2BHYB0RROHgxyig20AjMPfSWKIG44HoIuhu CVTbrstt/rLJreRKlYfD1Ukrw4ePQnBa5aqBM/bP8Vtuo7LaXmDvmPzOTIuZ23hKPW+x V1efmoCraXIYBUimI2ifefM4MLXKoc42ycylKypLJvQpTp9SEQfjjxLp1rJn4H9I14Mp KGRJWlI6eh8KmX/mmDkd5QIAt61DjGtfmkh87jQHLur8KPxXgwE5jCafYm1TbWmr4h17 nVgw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=n1IQEZX1; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e3-20020a170902ef4300b0014cb68abd4bsi12770295plx.477.2022.03.07.12.53.42; Mon, 07 Mar 2022 12:54:04 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=n1IQEZX1; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235218AbiCGNqa (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 7 Mar 2022 08:46:30 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44758 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232755AbiCGNq3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Mar 2022 08:46:29 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com (mail-wr1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::430]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D35B8BF4C; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 05:45:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id t11so23382592wrm.5; Mon, 07 Mar 2022 05:45:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=HRWYQj6ygSui15Ezjgo123BR8/QmAv/FWR5OuEvV+NI=; b=n1IQEZX17CMKDWNM426OeL5UtCpuckOQnDSb2LW7JtAZ60GJ7ZaWUwoghdLIyBrcFU eB9ZbKtjhDrqtElqD5nKWEwi5TSQKsSP0erByxRQ1Yf+oacCqmy89FW9GWmrANrXzgl4 aqsHl1M+AkFrY3U5NO1k6onrvu1BlRgG7fWclvIjoxNyA99SBztI3AZtZL1UEqBjQtCE hjL7kfGh4uVAo5SB0srU6lgZGtWgjH3s0ki07g/6MSVWu87DZ1n8J8xdDUpwzjEWz3uu F6EwiuejvSg0J9WOuw6n++lIHh/LmlQQ7roSXaNRCUnSmHCKGk4D34TKVO57Sl8DwQxP rb1A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=HRWYQj6ygSui15Ezjgo123BR8/QmAv/FWR5OuEvV+NI=; b=MJbPXS736RvmzjuYdxmbl90t4kq0g8YXRMjdWROVIhmX+Fpvi422/YYqlfLX2Dg/1S 4hDlnQVLjMSHTNTnWoH9K2l3o3dqBkVhSS1NhaaJqfy3GPLHUB7WZ6Jd98DO1rjUkZCU VmX49hI2wfjcoFzNKFC6ZxVgR2/clNI93jE0qYeJ7zPgWlhgfcNdoccQ1CpYv10MwXy3 uiRAvGXs8IMSUvvAV3MduTTs/ujE9CQDAWztFVmyssyAjkg1enK9MJ92Mv9DzqMCsuGA nLpLtL+OArMkTyMSTO/vb/hHtvWo/TJG3ZjNqRaMH+n0PmxKXoLejKpWlf5C9IAyADCI BARw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530VU5HrTRisTvTLPXu8q6SWmOgfqe+ZLdcDRbz6ZOI5sbssM1/9 harimKJ0cecmFTlaIwuExSQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:168e:b0:1f1:faf1:23b7 with SMTP id y14-20020a056000168e00b001f1faf123b7mr2561745wrd.150.1646660732772; Mon, 07 Mar 2022 05:45:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from Red ([2a01:cb1d:3d5:a100:264b:feff:fe03:2806]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g17-20020adff411000000b001f03426827csm11419676wro.71.2022.03.07.05.45.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 07 Mar 2022 05:45:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 14:45:28 +0100 From: Corentin Labbe To: Robin Murphy Cc: Gilad Ben-Yossef , hch@lst.de, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, Herbert Xu , Linux Crypto Mailing List , Linux kernel mailing list , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [BUG] crypto: ccree: driver does not handle case where cryptlen = authsize =0 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Le Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 11:14:16AM +0000, Robin Murphy a ?crit : > On 2022-03-07 10:48, Corentin Labbe wrote: > > Le Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 09:59:29AM +0200, Gilad Ben-Yossef a �crit : > >> On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 11:49 PM Herbert Xu wrote: > >>> > >>> On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 02:30:06PM +0100, Corentin Labbe wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hello > >>>> > >>>> I got: > >>>> [ 17.563793] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > >>>> [ 17.568492] DMA-API: ccree e6601000.crypto: device driver frees DMA memory with different direction [device address=0x0000000078fe5800] [size=8 bytes] [mapped with DMA_TO_DEVICE] [unmapped with DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL] > >>> > >>> The direction argument during unmap must match whatever direction > >>> you used during the original map call. > >> > >> > >> Yes, of course. I changed one but forgot the other. > >> > >> Corentin, could you be kind and check that this solves the original > >> problem and does not produce new warnings? > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ccree/cc_buffer_mgr.c > >> b/drivers/crypto/ccree/cc_buffer_mgr.c > >> index 11e0278c8631..31cfe014922e 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/crypto/ccree/cc_buffer_mgr.c > >> +++ b/drivers/crypto/ccree/cc_buffer_mgr.c > >> @@ -356,12 +356,14 @@ void cc_unmap_cipher_request(struct device *dev, > >> void *ctx, > >> req_ctx->mlli_params.mlli_dma_addr); > >> } > >> > >> - dma_unmap_sg(dev, src, req_ctx->in_nents, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL); > >> - dev_dbg(dev, "Unmapped req->src=%pK\n", sg_virt(src)); > >> - > >> if (src != dst) { > >> - dma_unmap_sg(dev, dst, req_ctx->out_nents, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL); > >> + dma_unmap_sg(dev, src, req_ctx->in_nents, DMA_TO_DEVICE); > >> + dma_unmap_sg(dev, dst, req_ctx->out_nents, DMA_FROM_DEVICE); > >> dev_dbg(dev, "Unmapped req->dst=%pK\n", sg_virt(dst)); > >> + dev_dbg(dev, "Unmapped req->src=%pK\n", sg_virt(src)); > >> + } else { > >> + dma_unmap_sg(dev, src, req_ctx->in_nents, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL); > >> + dev_dbg(dev, "Unmapped req->src=%pK\n", sg_virt(src)); > >> } > >> } > >> > >> @@ -377,6 +379,7 @@ int cc_map_cipher_request(struct cc_drvdata > >> *drvdata, void *ctx, > >> u32 dummy = 0; > >> int rc = 0; > >> u32 mapped_nents = 0; > >> + int src_direction = (src != dst ? DMA_TO_DEVICE : DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL); > >> > >> req_ctx->dma_buf_type = CC_DMA_BUF_DLLI; > >> mlli_params->curr_pool = NULL; > >> @@ -399,7 +402,7 @@ int cc_map_cipher_request(struct cc_drvdata > >> *drvdata, void *ctx, > >> } > >> > >> /* Map the src SGL */ > >> - rc = cc_map_sg(dev, src, nbytes, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, &req_ctx->in_nents, > >> + rc = cc_map_sg(dev, src, nbytes, src_direction, &req_ctx->in_nents, > >> LLI_MAX_NUM_OF_DATA_ENTRIES, &dummy, &mapped_nents); > >> if (rc) > >> goto cipher_exit; > >> @@ -416,7 +419,7 @@ int cc_map_cipher_request(struct cc_drvdata > >> *drvdata, void *ctx, > >> } > >> } else { > >> /* Map the dst sg */ > >> - rc = cc_map_sg(dev, dst, nbytes, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, > >> + rc = cc_map_sg(dev, dst, nbytes, DMA_FROM_DEVICE, > >> &req_ctx->out_nents, LLI_MAX_NUM_OF_DATA_ENTRIES, > >> &dummy, &mapped_nents); > >> if (rc) > >> > >> > > > > Hello > > > > I still get the warning: > > [ 433.406230] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > [ 433.406326] DMA-API: ccree e6601000.crypto: cacheline tracking EEXIST, overlapping mappings aren't supported > > [ 433.406386] WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 31074 at /home/clabbe/linux-next/kernel/dma/debug.c:571 add_dma_entry+0x1d0/0x288 > > [ 433.406434] Modules linked in: > > [ 433.406458] CPU: 7 PID: 31074 Comm: kcapi Not tainted 5.17.0-rc6-next-20220303-00130-g30042e47ee47-dirty #54 > > [ 433.406473] Hardware name: Renesas Salvator-X board based on r8a77950 (DT) > > [ 433.406484] pstate: 40000005 (nZcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) > > [ 433.406498] pc : add_dma_entry+0x1d0/0x288 > > [ 433.406510] lr : add_dma_entry+0x1d0/0x288 > > [ 433.406522] sp : ffff800015da3690 > > [ 433.406531] x29: ffff800015da3690 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: 0000000000000000 > > [ 433.406562] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffff80000b4c7bc0 x24: ffff80000b4c7000 > > [ 433.406593] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 00000000ffffffef x21: ffff80000a9b6000 > > [ 433.406623] x20: ffff0004c0af5c00 x19: ffff80000b420000 x18: ffffffffffffffff > > [ 433.406653] x17: 6c7265766f202c54 x16: 534958454520676e x15: 000000000000022e > > [ 433.406683] x14: ffff800015da3380 x13: 00000000ffffffea x12: ffff80000b4be010 > > [ 433.406713] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: 0000000000000001 x9 : ffff80000b4a6028 > > [ 433.406743] x8 : c0000000ffffefff x7 : 0000000000017fe8 x6 : ffff80000b4a5fd0 > > [ 433.406773] x5 : ffff0006ff795c48 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000027 > > [ 433.406802] x2 : 0000000000000023 x1 : 8ca4e4fbf4b87900 x0 : 0000000000000000 > > [ 433.406833] Call trace: > > [ 433.406841] add_dma_entry+0x1d0/0x288 > > [ 433.406854] debug_dma_map_sg+0x150/0x398 > > [ 433.406869] __dma_map_sg_attrs+0x9c/0x108 > > [ 433.406889] dma_map_sg_attrs+0x10/0x28 > > [ 433.406904] cc_map_sg+0x80/0x100 > > [ 433.406924] cc_map_cipher_request+0x178/0x3c8 > > [ 433.406939] cc_cipher_process+0x210/0xb58 > > [ 433.406953] cc_cipher_encrypt+0x2c/0x38 > > [ 433.406967] crypto_skcipher_encrypt+0x44/0x78 > > [ 433.406986] skcipher_recvmsg+0x36c/0x420 > > [ 433.407003] ____sys_recvmsg+0x90/0x280 > > [ 433.407024] ___sys_recvmsg+0x88/0xd0 > > [ 433.407038] __sys_recvmsg+0x6c/0xd0 > > [ 433.407049] __arm64_sys_recvmsg+0x24/0x30 > > [ 433.407061] invoke_syscall+0x44/0x100 > > [ 433.407082] el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0x90/0x120 > > [ 433.407096] do_el0_svc+0x24/0x88 > > [ 433.407110] el0_svc+0x4c/0x100 > > [ 433.407131] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x90/0xb8 > > [ 433.407145] el0t_64_sync+0x170/0x174 > > [ 433.407160] irq event stamp: 5624 > > [ 433.407168] hardirqs last enabled at (5623): [] __up_console_sem+0x60/0x98 > > [ 433.407191] hardirqs last disabled at (5624): [] el1_dbg+0x28/0x90 > > [ 433.407208] softirqs last enabled at (5570): [] lock_sock_nested+0x80/0xa0 > > [ 433.407226] softirqs last disabled at (5568): [] lock_sock_nested+0x60/0xa0 > > [ 433.407241] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- > > [ 433.407381] DMA-API: Mapped at: > > [ 433.407396] debug_dma_map_sg+0x16c/0x398 > > [ 433.407416] __dma_map_sg_attrs+0x9c/0x108 > > [ 433.407436] dma_map_sg_attrs+0x10/0x28 > > [ 433.407455] cc_map_sg+0x80/0x100 > > [ 433.407475] cc_map_cipher_request+0x178/0x3c8 > > > > > > BUT I start to thing this is a bug in DMA-API debug. > > > > > > My sun8i-ss driver hit the same warning: > > [ 142.458351] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 90 at kernel/dma/debug.c:597 add_dma_entry+0x2ec/0x4cc > > [ 142.458429] DMA-API: sun8i-ss 1c15000.crypto: cacheline tracking EEXIST, overlapping mappings aren't supported > > [ 142.458455] Modules linked in: ccm algif_aead xts cmac > > [ 142.458563] CPU: 1 PID: 90 Comm: 1c15000.crypto- Not tainted 5.17.0-rc6-next-20220307-00132-g39dad568d20a-dirty #223 > > [ 142.458581] Hardware name: Allwinner A83t board > > [ 142.458596] unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14 > > [ 142.458627] show_stack from 0xf0abdd1c > > [ 142.458646] irq event stamp: 31747 > > [ 142.458660] hardirqs last enabled at (31753): [] __up_console_sem+0x50/0x60 > > [ 142.458688] hardirqs last disabled at (31758): [] __up_console_sem+0x3c/0x60 > > [ 142.458710] softirqs last enabled at (31600): [] sun8i_ss_handle_cipher_request+0x300/0x8b8 > > [ 142.458738] softirqs last disabled at (31580): [] sun8i_ss_handle_cipher_request+0x300/0x8b8 > > [ 142.458758] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- > > [ 142.458771] DMA-API: Mapped at: > > > > Yes the mapped at is empty just after. > > > > And the sequence of DMA operations in my driver is simple, so I cannot see how any overlap could occur. > > The "overlap" is in the sense of having more than one mapping within the > same cacheline: > > [ 142.458120] DMA-API: add_dma_entry start P=ba79f200 N=ba79f > D=ba79f200 L=10 DMA_FROM_DEVICE attrs=0 > [ 142.458156] DMA-API: add_dma_entry start P=445dc010 N=445dc > D=445dc010 L=10 DMA_TO_DEVICE attrs=0 > [ 142.458178] sun8i-ss 1c15000.crypto: SRC 0/1/1 445dc000 len=16 bi=0 > [ 142.458215] sun8i-ss 1c15000.crypto: DST 0/1/1 ba79f200 len=16 bi=0 > [ 142.458234] DMA-API: add_dma_entry start P=ba79f210 N=ba79f > D=ba79f210 L=10 DMA_FROM_DEVICE attrs=0 > > This actually illustrates exactly the reason why this is unsupportable. > ba79f200 is mapped for DMA_FROM_DEVICE, therefore subsequently mapping > ba79f210 for DMA_TO_DEVICE may cause the cacheline covering the range > ba79f200-ba79f23f to be written back over the top of data that the > device has already started to write to memory. Hello data corruption. > > Separate DMA mappings should be from separate memory allocations, > respecting ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN. > I just saw something strange, only one SG is involved, and I dont see any DMA_TO_DEVICE for ba79f210. I see 2 DMA_FROM_DEVICE (ba79f200 and ba79f210), but only one should be done. Why 2 FROM mappings are added with only one sg ?