Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <e10f2161aaa69a9d301b3a16a37cbab266318aee.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] KEYS: CA link restriction
From:   Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To:     Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>,
        Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
Cc:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
        "dwmw2@infradead.org" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
        "herbert@gondor.apana.org.au" <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
        "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        "jmorris@namei.org" <jmorris@namei.org>,
        "serge@hallyn.com" <serge@hallyn.com>,
        "nayna@linux.ibm.com" <nayna@linux.ibm.com>,
        "mic@linux.microsoft.com" <mic@linux.microsoft.com>,
        Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
        "keyrings@vger.kernel.org" <keyrings@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" 
        <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 08 Mar 2022 07:45:03 -0500
In-Reply-To: <22860730-d615-5683-6af0-05b6f4f3e71d@linux.ibm.com>
References: <20220301173651.3435350-1-eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
         <20220301173651.3435350-4-eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
         <47f3654e-892d-a35a-e77c-70ada1ebcf43@linux.ibm.com>
         <2415444C-AD8F-4F03-8B1C-C0770F83ADAE@oracle.com>
         <e2dd58cd6074ae692256333b43b5ecde70bcdbdd.camel@linux.ibm.com>
         <67456A73-8B72-4DB6-8E23-7C603661A0A4@oracle.com>
         <22860730-d615-5683-6af0-05b6f4f3e71d@linux.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 21:31 -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> 
> On 3/7/22 18:38, Eric Snowberg wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >> On Mar 7, 2022, at 4:01 PM, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 18:06 +0000, Eric Snowberg wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/restrict.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/restrict.c
> >>>>> index 6b1ac5f5896a..49bb2ea7f609 100644
> >>>>> --- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/restrict.c
> >>>>> +++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/restrict.c
> >>>>> @@ -108,6 +108,49 @@ int restrict_link_by_signature(struct key *dest_keyring,
> >>>>> 	return ret;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>> +/**
> >>>>> + * restrict_link_by_ca - Restrict additions to a ring of CA keys
> >>>>> + * @dest_keyring: Keyring being linked to.
> >>>>> + * @type: The type of key being added.
> >>>>> + * @payload: The payload of the new key.
> >>>>> + * @trust_keyring: Unused.
> >>>>> + *
> >>>>> + * Check if the new certificate is a CA. If it is a CA, then mark the new
> >>>>> + * certificate as being ok to link.
> >>>>
> >>>> CA = root CA here, right?
> >>>
> >>> Yes, I’ll update the comment
> >>
> >> Updating the comment is not enough.  There's an existing function named
> >> "x509_check_for_self_signed()" which determines whether the certificate
> >> is self-signed.
> > 
> > Originally I tried using that function.  However when the restrict link code is called,
> > all the necessary x509 information is no longer available.   The code in
> > restrict_link_by_ca is basically doing the equivalent to x509_check_for_self_signed.
> > After verifying the cert has the CA flag set, the call to public_key_verify_signature
> > validates the cert is self signed.
> > 
> Isn't x509_cert_parse() being called as part of parsing the certificate? 
> If so, it seems to check for a self-signed certificate every time. You 
> could add something like the following to x509_check_for_self_signed(cert):
> pub->x509_self_signed = cert->self_signed = true;
> 
> This could then reduce the function in 3/4 to something like:
> 
> return payload->data[asym_crypto]->x509_self_signed;

Agreed, as long as the other two criteria are also met: CA and keyUsage
should be required and limited to keyCertSign.

thanks,

Mimi