Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <d1a23bfa-9160-7270-2180-d9720c12a5cc@digikod.net>
Date:   Tue, 22 Mar 2022 11:55:25 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: 
Content-Language: en-US
To:     David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Cc:     David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>,
        Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20220321174548.510516-1-mic@digikod.net>
 <f595c9c2da606b799f3a8ded9807cb6d892156c5.camel@infradead.org>
From:   =?UTF-8?Q?Micka=c3=abl_Sala=c3=bcn?= <mic@digikod.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/1] Explain panic() calls for keyring initialization
In-Reply-To: <f595c9c2da606b799f3a8ded9807cb6d892156c5.camel@infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk


On 21/03/2022 19:29, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-03-21 at 18:45 +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
>>
>> Mickaël Salaün (1):
>>    certs: Explain the rational to call panic()
> 
> Nit: "rationale". Even in Simplified English, I believe "rational" is a
> completely different word.

Right, "rational" is an adjective.


> 
>>   certs/blacklist.c | 8 ++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> Also, isn't it about time we changed this to call it a denylist?
> 

It is important to note that this word is part of the kernel ABI because 
of the keyring name.