Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org does not designate 23.128.96.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.19;
Date:   Mon, 2 May 2022 17:30:24 +0200
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
To:     mzxreary@0pointer.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sysctl: read() must consume poll events, not poll()
Message-ID: <Ym/5EEYHbk56hV1H@zx2c4.com>
References: <20220502140602.130373-1-Jason@zx2c4.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220502140602.130373-1-Jason@zx2c4.com>
Precedence: bulk

+Lennart, since systemd is the only userspace I know of currently making
use of this.

On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 04:06:01PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Events that poll() responds to are supposed to be consumed when the file
> is read(), not by the poll() itself. By putting it on the poll() itself,
> it makes it impossible to poll() on a epoll file descriptor, since the
> event gets consumed too early. Jann wrote a PoC, available in the link
> below.
> 
> Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAG48ez1F0P7Wnp=PGhiUej=u=8CSF6gpD9J=Oxxg0buFRqV1tA@mail.gmail.com/
> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
> ---
>  fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c | 12 +++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
> index 7d9cfc730bd4..1aa145794207 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
> @@ -622,6 +622,14 @@ static ssize_t proc_sys_call_handler(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
>  
>  static ssize_t proc_sys_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
>  {
> +	struct inode *inode = file_inode(iocb->ki_filp);
> +	struct ctl_table_header *head = grab_header(inode);
> +	struct ctl_table *table = PROC_I(inode)->sysctl_entry;
> +
> +	if (!IS_ERR(head) && table->poll)
> +		iocb->ki_filp->private_data = proc_sys_poll_event(table->poll);
> +	sysctl_head_finish(head);
> +
>  	return proc_sys_call_handler(iocb, iter, 0);
>  }
>  
> @@ -668,10 +676,8 @@ static __poll_t proc_sys_poll(struct file *filp, poll_table *wait)
>  	event = (unsigned long)filp->private_data;
>  	poll_wait(filp, &table->poll->wait, wait);
>  
> -	if (event != atomic_read(&table->poll->event)) {
> -		filp->private_data = proc_sys_poll_event(table->poll);
> +	if (event != atomic_read(&table->poll->event))
>  		ret = EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM | EPOLLERR | EPOLLPRI;
> -	}
>  
>  out:
>  	sysctl_head_finish(head);
> -- 
> 2.35.1

Just wanted to double check with you that this change wouldn't break how
you're using it in systemd for /proc/sys/kernel/hostname:

https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/39cd62c30c2e6bb5ec13ebc1ecf0d37ed015b1b8/src/journal/journald-server.c#L1832
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/39cd62c30c2e6bb5ec13ebc1ecf0d37ed015b1b8/src/resolve/resolved-manager.c#L465

I couldn't find anybody else actually polling on it. Interestingly, it
looks like sd_event_add_io uses epoll() inside, but you're not hitting
the bug that Jann pointed out (because I suppose you're not poll()ing on
an epoll fd).

Jason