Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 27 May 2022 09:45:46 +0100
From:   Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com>
To:     Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Cc:     yoan.picchi@arm.com, ardb@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
        herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qat-linux@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] Removes the x86 dependency on the QAT drivers
Message-ID: <YpCPulwFuNHHtw1V@silpixa00400314>
References: <CAMj1kXGAiA-SkTFD5EgcacYao0RKT7oK0AxvxkR7Ho_KZSGXCw@mail.gmail.com>
 <8f6d8d1f-2872-15b9-d38b-1e8eb26f781b@foss.arm.com>
 <YoyOg/kYGtO+nQac@silpixa00400314>
 <20220525141239.48589f25@donnerap.cambridge.arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220525141239.48589f25@donnerap.cambridge.arm.com>
Organization: Intel Research and Development Ireland Ltd - Co. Reg. #308263 -
 Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare - Ireland
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 02:12:39PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> So testing this in BE is a bit more involved, and the practicality of such
> a setup is very questionable. If you are concerned, should we just say:
> 	depends on PCI && !CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
> At least until we have reports that confirm proper BE operation?
Sounds reasonable.

Thanks,

-- 
Giovanni