Received: by 2002:a6b:fb09:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id h9csp409764iog; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 06:29:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1sgoj6+mIu+YuvNmU+NGx/+nb3xYxYeRKNW4dpQiOyAV6nu26UGdvBM7Ol3UE62BWvgRlGq X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1d51:b0:41f:cf6c:35a5 with SMTP id dz17-20020a0564021d5100b0041fcf6c35a5mr17752737edb.25.1656077363898; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 06:29:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1656077363; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pY3mULZBjN4iztjUcDyu4Qh7Bt+2cPJAbnCXffs6MyI4KPYHqkQGAvogI4lrflPzp/ nUCnpQqZrSckxIZVWQTkNLqsZOCu6+n35RKfnFxOjZF7MLWHc0IDm9SNNutiFx3KwSYP 3vQj+3Kxozm/Y/7vU26Gqns+9oILFfXD0rru4k5BOQT/PiRz1K6SAklCr/uazv67xJXA 7co8NhJpejybQGPmGjUVYlwOMePE+qD4ZCUzzrcOX0dTHFrCc+1/BXtVRw4oTrenE2TQ v3clS8ABkjzAX4M47J1p/4oEG5TZPuDmyGfVPE+6BcSEdFeAA6W9mXG/PQa00EVx6/zh Ga8Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:user-agent:references:message-id :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=CaRRPZo+RX85SRVGPFOgQ7TTJZG8uS+vgjh0rBmqWOI=; b=rbevGVtMU6r+5yVF9zzCqLK7UyAXxmOxqUwRQBpXXw55P6a9zO8ZR/W5D00PqUkaqL DrbVtkHXG9Bl24Asov909pLWWmHTWmNR6fc+uBqg/zUm7iITu98F95KcoSr56R1ewd3o e6oEvI0iADGY24LowdAD6wCoLnX7N8c4SML6uz+B4MuYlS3kzkFpSKQAeofzdcoO81v9 6dMf5D6tcmaUZFDUVdfYFlOuotNYSztm4XbbFC10qGySmrcLaIwCp5KuqnraVPVArGq9 oRABtT8aI8GIr0FD/gRfI8GyRRCb1h1DZKTzc+oma08+V5iTrC5mW4MbNbv2U0z1QEjf sieg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v4-20020a50d084000000b0043590b289d6si2720435edd.215.2022.06.24.06.28.52; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 06:29:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231426AbiFXNZV (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:25:21 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60228 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229584AbiFXNZU (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:25:20 -0400 Received: from angie.orcam.me.uk (angie.orcam.me.uk [78.133.224.34]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E8F527EA; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 06:25:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by angie.orcam.me.uk (Postfix, from userid 500) id 614A692009C; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 15:25:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by angie.orcam.me.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F1E92009B; Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:25:17 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 14:25:17 +0100 (BST) From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" cc: LKML , Linux Crypto Mailing List , Thomas Gleixner , Arnd Bergmann , Thomas Bogendoerfer Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/17] mips: use fallback for random_get_entropy() instead of just c0 random In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20220423212623.1957011-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> <20220423212623.1957011-10-Jason@zx2c4.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Hi Jason, > > There is lots of optimization potential on a few fronts we've identified > > in this thread. Let's save these for a follow-up. I'd rather this > > initial one be at least somewhat simple, so that as it gets optimized, > > it'll be easy to handle regressions. Also, it probably makes sense for > > you to send the patches for these, since you have both the hardware > > chops and the hardware itself to assess these ideas. I am interested in > > the topic though, so please do CC me. > > Everything has been upstream for a little while now, which means > development of this can move back to the proper MIPS tree like normal. > Did you want to submit some optimizations? Would be happy to look at > whatever you have in mind. Thank you for the heads-up! Unfortunately I'm a little stuck at the moment, especially as one of my main MIPS machines (a 5Kc Malta system) died mid-May while operating. It seems to be a faulty CPU core card and the base board may be fine, though I cannot know for sure as I only have one each and I don't have a logic analyser or at least a JTAG probe to peek at the system and see what's going on inside. If anyone knows a source of a replacement Malta, preferably with a 5Kc CoreLV CPU module or another 64-bit hard core card (a number of different ones have been made), then I'll appreciate if you let me know. I feel rather depressed knowing that many if not most hit the scrapper already while they could still find a good use. Somehow it is easier to get way more obsolete hardware from 1980/90s just because it was general purpose rather than niche. Otherwise I'll try to get back to this stuff later in the year with whatever I have that still runs, but don't hold your breath. Sorry! Maciej