Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 30 Jun 2022 15:16:47 +0800
From:   Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
To:     Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Cc:     linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] crypto: Introduce ARIA symmetric cipher algorithm
Message-ID: <Yr1N376O00fS0Skd@gondor.apana.org.au>
References: <Yr1FBOC8Zi1ltlBi@gondor.apana.org.au>
 <50203730-35f1-4bf9-3f3a-ca6cd3b01d4a@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <50203730-35f1-4bf9-3f3a-ca6cd3b01d4a@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 04:13:19PM +0900, Taehee Yoo wrote:
>
> So, my plan is to add the kTLS feature because aria-TLS[2] is now standard.
> So, Is it okay to add the aria-kTLS feature into the v2 patch, instead of
> aria-IPsec?

Sure.  As long as the kTLS people are happy to add this then it's
good to go.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt