Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <b273e4ed-311e-3821-c742-a7911046f2b5@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 30 Jun 2022 16:22:46 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.9.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] crypto: Introduce ARIA symmetric cipher algorithm
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc:     linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net
References: <Yr1FBOC8Zi1ltlBi@gondor.apana.org.au>
 <50203730-35f1-4bf9-3f3a-ca6cd3b01d4a@gmail.com>
 <Yr1N376O00fS0Skd@gondor.apana.org.au>
From:   Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <Yr1N376O00fS0Skd@gondor.apana.org.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 6/30/22 16:16, Herbert Xu wrote:
 > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 04:13:19PM +0900, Taehee Yoo wrote:
 >>
 >> So, my plan is to add the kTLS feature because aria-TLS[2] is now 
standard.
 >> So, Is it okay to add the aria-kTLS feature into the v2 patch, 
instead of
 >> aria-IPsec?
 >
 > Sure.  As long as the kTLS people are happy to add this then it's
 > good to go.
 >
 > Cheers,

I will add aria-kTLS feature into the v2 patch and I will send it to 
both the crypto and netdev mailing list after some tests.

Thanks a lot!
Taehee Yoo