Received: by 2002:a05:6358:bb9e:b0:b9:5105:a5b4 with SMTP id df30csp5113886rwb; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 19:20:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR51MKq01FONMAJliV6VSaI0FC9DVItk81p/98rTFUaKBgMmchpZT5Zdx+X1OT7FEDc4tw+3 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:493:b0:445:b5f0:7a0f with SMTP id k19-20020a056402049300b00445b5f07a0fmr1178180edv.120.1662517232470; Tue, 06 Sep 2022 19:20:32 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1662517232; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vArFgreWqeYDO9gZX4+DThS0Ae79V6cozTafpPUArgOKcpGCaeZauUxnEpmZ1bBYW/ FIH8msJ+uqZOQakT+iZW1SY7LGLT+z4Qxe5rvy6vD4HhfSVLIMXuOIv8B+Pi0JDNC/mH xWcLgz0YoRKLW1N4dhUBmeOj36nztd8M7JchlNRXis5pNDh9l+DFN2yjk5OJ5WcVd8Uz BKV5BRA+HZKn2wqb4zMBFe9BrL/GmqDhmndzrE6P+nwp7lkuB74J3TOdNzIAAnSvSdZn SFTVlfJMUDtnrNNh47i63PgbZNdk1h7T1qiSU9VNQmu68ztcUbx8NoIhjI2hikQ/rELC Efkg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=gTD4vqKimKyzQ63/e8kvFPbLyhKcFEXoR0oWNWd5SLo=; b=H83mDU63GJ10ERZey8Tf7fVNBYX4w1J/+hDPBsDYJN8LDtvfXKPmKt6v4cYIOIiv1W QXdfZ/LRxw2O8nGP3h7MKNWdP6MI1uC7qCqcDM+j+viWdy6SEd8RFEcuCr1Zo80JrbmC +oHeP22LiOOuFjv92S5Z/RiMYt4fXCzyLjK4ZovgjvI6S9r7zYU8W0jzIKNPoa3qBaf+ nNyIRtaiwgXFfp41XRimNs5suznHZqIt+oWExGmzCYHwtLDfMM8HW8gXOV0qIzplL703 WW7ux1ZeI7z9fuNncWZPsrnnuNEjL4nub8xhq9bVMt7Dz88mi6Kd/eOaXCT9cOeJYBD7 SkwQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z13-20020a05640240cd00b00448aec620e0si13039768edb.17.2022.09.06.19.19.57; Tue, 06 Sep 2022 19:20:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229663AbiIGCOV (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 6 Sep 2022 22:14:21 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52776 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229687AbiIGCOV (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2022 22:14:21 -0400 Received: from fornost.hmeau.com (helcar.hmeau.com [216.24.177.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A039F89CF7; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 19:14:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gwarestrin.arnor.me.apana.org.au ([192.168.103.7]) by fornost.hmeau.com with smtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Debian)) id 1oVkZX-001p2n-7V; Wed, 07 Sep 2022 12:13:48 +1000 Received: by gwarestrin.arnor.me.apana.org.au (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 07 Sep 2022 10:13:47 +0800 Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 10:13:47 +0800 From: Herbert Xu To: Neal Liu Cc: Randy Dunlap , "David S . Miller" , Joel Stanley , Andrew Jeffery , linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, BMC-SW@aspeedtech.com, kernel test robot Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] crypto: aspeed: fix format unexpected build warning Message-ID: References: <20220905052449.1830669-1-neal_liu@aspeedtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220905052449.1830669-1-neal_liu@aspeedtech.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 01:24:49PM +0800, Neal Liu wrote: > > @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static int aspeed_hace_ahash_trigger(struct aspeed_hace_dev *hace_dev, > struct ahash_request *req = hash_engine->req; > struct aspeed_sham_reqctx *rctx = ahash_request_ctx(req); > > - AHASH_DBG(hace_dev, "src_dma:0x%x, digest_dma:0x%x, length:0x%x\n", > + AHASH_DBG(hace_dev, "src_dma:%zu, digest_dma:%zu, length:%zu\n", > hash_engine->src_dma, hash_engine->digest_dma, > hash_engine->src_length); Shouldn't we use %pad instead of %zu for dma_addr_t (you'll also need to pass in a dma_addr_t pointer instead of the value)? Thanks, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt