Received: by 2002:a05:6358:1087:b0:cb:c9d3:cd90 with SMTP id j7csp269275rwi; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 01:30:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5zlsN4h634fuUTNShvJ7SR9YQllBdG00bjO4mShKPSCLzjJdPj7LoJ/MTN5OPljDrId9uZ X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b417:b0:181:d0e4:3310 with SMTP id x23-20020a170902b41700b00181d0e43310mr4234820plr.134.1665736201771; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 01:30:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1665736201; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gv+QKL1Uh+FKcXRmpZs1NgShKhM9UpHwus4ulvbuqEzBxlg0KLTD1Vg7xFMB589GiJ RygikE9nBZnNYtNwl28KAzSwBBRBusEojhLdDN33e27eAPW08IynIeNBqgY4T7xno9G/ d/+Hmvv9GcOi7WQcnZD+XQqQhPAyp39G6Ry9VfQtaMKQmirSSioXK3og8Mg0KssYQQqb NMIaRxQspKi6GCFEvvFLOFt2kLL0ykyIrtVZtgmZTji/yDZHQi0KqeTf/UImr1EoDpQp JTFTGyYifSHuYo6QCtzH2HGxBzxuSc3yFRjhKaqI45+hCEUjSy/52YbBUa/Obp5flrKx yLxg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=/v0qyn9zjTUTmaYtIBTKJ39d9AZq0Rf+iasGU2+cl1Q=; b=WQBCWUFOpiIWRpQie7430m3g/3ML3X1B5982rnQGu3yv5Yf5uhTW2Ali4Py1pJm5W/ IGEP59Do0ZVJp642GJ9YLwTxiCBDJuhiroTF/NIBBLP3CZXU21w8Al6a3n7ySxxNlKkT /c+giX7Iu1rsxwNx5wlT0iCSXuB8I4ojCd0ltxkEk9PaI5mgIUfKMQFwA2h7e74b9W2g HMp3L5GXJOP67zkzph9mLkxgneGVKFqrCt0ZLmDQ0CyJn9e1WRg2AZUdLk8W3PuKDX0h qIUz8QjPxPtttxRcdHz4EeNY72IirT/PgRVZmSMVx0Aa4odCCWTAi6N97G3i9R5jMXsS ZCaw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j3-20020a625503000000b00542c772d478si1769279pfb.247.2022.10.14.01.29.46; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 01:30:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229714AbiJNI0M (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 14 Oct 2022 04:26:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42454 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229729AbiJNI0M (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Oct 2022 04:26:12 -0400 Received: from fornost.hmeau.com (helcar.hmeau.com [216.24.177.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC7741C208B; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 01:26:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gwarestrin.arnor.me.apana.org.au ([192.168.103.7]) by fornost.hmeau.com with smtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Debian)) id 1ojG0z-00EdPa-VO; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 19:25:59 +1100 Received: by gwarestrin.arnor.me.apana.org.au (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 14 Oct 2022 16:25:57 +0800 Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 16:25:57 +0800 From: Herbert Xu To: Yang Shen Cc: davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] crypto: benchmark - add the crypto benchmark Message-ID: References: <20220919120537.39258-1-shenyang39@huawei.com> <3dd984c1-d17f-0a6a-c52e-87e161f867fc@huawei.com> <09d0686b-1955-c63d-c02d-fb0d2db42672@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <09d0686b-1955-c63d-c02d-fb0d2db42672@huawei.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 09:43:40AM +0800, Yang Shen wrote: > > Got it. I'll try to support this on the tcrypt. Before you get too far into this, please note that I have no preference as to whether you go with tcrypt or your new benchmark code. My only requirement is that we pick one mechanism. But obivously others might have a preference so you should try to produce RFCs as early as possible. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt