Received: by 2002:a05:6358:1087:b0:cb:c9d3:cd90 with SMTP id j7csp5127846rwi; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 16:08:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM58dUUsdCY8Zcsb7udNeFpQzfLERYJZWNC3SD9r46h1B4Ws1MwF+cD1aWYL0zL1uIx7Lxx2 X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:9625:b0:78d:bb0c:4a40 with SMTP id gb37-20020a170907962500b0078dbb0c4a40mr36616ejc.339.1666048099524; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 16:08:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1666048099; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=a9Zg6NLDi5SjKP43Ri+r/LSWQYpC5tj+WjoHuyhfFcVHaOu/rjDjFntBWJJsXmq8ih d5pmoM3KhGQIihqDHod/orIzgqx1MGDcVoiVHZBtUowPloMH2JWpN8WOUvmCfSrtYFj/ GeEAZeGYofPu4utiz5j8+G4SUglsbhF6C/x75fgaOchTNzKruOXsqlerkDbySOlNyJ1X Qgl1YNrnvZTS6jJb054EJ3dQPtzRLexaj54enH6wxJQtyblXOimbtu7I2tLIkFl5ubX6 1QnfrTn1+uI7sNPGOVtg93zRXRpnmDhNg7FbWc+nYBl8LDyWYJTPUJc49a564fz5uVjd pY8w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=94tYuefgtWPfyCvOUrUyAOgbeaoFp06NOREUl7VyCWQ=; b=R2SZwKz2iDJYWpV9gZTox0jr+aPnugtCUyA7E/SztQLqLqNE1tH1x8RN1p87sittcx UXsjSXGC/pD283eRmRTveJ39cbOkubLU8OBkcAbtuKiIQ53c18ru/d5UEvqcHUeoYRwO jeUTW3REshPQgUFu2oR29uPRsGi3xXB3XhU0TamAQLLTsszy7GsVKNTdQ7+bXRp2/U2d DOC18Ly4XQAPNOUbb4YRaq4fdqZ3DGFfKk7yJ06Lkx61xVeCZhQODVH9ggaeuRqsNKJX CjbXcmbLlErFuZvnmKH7bKR0nYaVYfH4psVf5zYD+4Y3UQQ17XUTkos1M6mTDwPeCtC6 T+Mw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=kVEOAJD9; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dr14-20020a170907720e00b00770880dff50si9452189ejc.586.2022.10.17.16.07.43; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 16:08:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=kVEOAJD9; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231522AbiJQXGr (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 17 Oct 2022 19:06:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56648 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231215AbiJQXGT (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2022 19:06:19 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 831DD82D0E; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 16:06:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB396612BC; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 23:02:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC691C43470; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 23:02:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1666047751; bh=BZ+LTZceLwdbNyktC2zUcnmC4URC/V/Chf6caZqqTqo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=kVEOAJD9FCiTEyXHjS84vDt77euPvo+OZ5bW1POhNQ8iNsNBWXXXbAW8Tk39VE9Sv OVO5qrRVTjN2ahRKi+n9FuuhARaWnmj3MZQySmoizZEBuI3oU7NRnkyCHVd+ComU8B qqOGD8PykJsU7d0AYzgwKYWjyrT3edEp0eRlRFfjvB7ts1+S1oGaVd9c0UBGFNHj1S tK+slTFluaemOGS7kwIF6Yf2DOzlMtdiC+ae4QpAILgvUZQC2d/HH0SVkBxAcbf6VQ Na18NWaXtqT3963CbK0hy9Gc3k7iwu/34T8VU0U+Szqx3B/eTYtQ2Z5JKCpcUBgBTB eYZp2rty06wZA== Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 16:02:29 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: Nathan Huckleberry Cc: Bruno Goncalves , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Ard Biesheuvel , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: x86/polyval - Fix crashes when keys are not 16-byte aligned Message-ID: References: <20221017222620.715153-1-nhuck@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221017222620.715153-1-nhuck@google.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 03:26:20PM -0700, Nathan Huckleberry wrote: > The key_powers array is not guaranteed to be 16-byte aligned, so using > movaps to operate on key_powers is not allowed. > > Switch movaps to movups. > > Fixes: 34f7f6c30112 ("crypto: x86/polyval - Add PCLMULQDQ accelerated implementation of POLYVAL") > Reported-by: Bruno Goncalves > Signed-off-by: Nathan Huckleberry > --- > arch/x86/crypto/polyval-clmulni_asm.S | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/polyval-clmulni_asm.S b/arch/x86/crypto/polyval-clmulni_asm.S > index a6ebe4e7dd2b..32b98cb53ddf 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/crypto/polyval-clmulni_asm.S > +++ b/arch/x86/crypto/polyval-clmulni_asm.S > @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ > > movups (MSG), %xmm0 > pxor SUM, %xmm0 > - movaps (KEY_POWERS), %xmm1 > + movups (KEY_POWERS), %xmm1 > schoolbook1_noload > dec BLOCKS_LEFT > addq $16, MSG I thought that crypto_tfm::__crt_ctx is guaranteed to be 16-byte aligned, and that the x86 AES code relies on that property. But now I see that actually the x86 AES code manually aligns the context. See aes_ctx() in arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c. Did you consider doing the same for polyval? If you do prefer this way, it would be helpful to leave a comment for schoolbook1_iteration that mentions that the unaligned access support of vpclmulqdq is being relied on, i.e. pclmulqdq wouldn't work. - Eric