Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp1393672rwb; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 00:48:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5VfnYnmbEVKoQfJMvC0YRctMwOZyiXfMHykbnOHA8osMi9+NHqZ4IDZ99303Z+RyzQe09k X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c14b:0:b0:461:c47d:48cf with SMTP id r11-20020aa7c14b000000b00461c47d48cfmr47816986edp.83.1667810934651; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 00:48:54 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1667810934; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=e1V0O4Psu+Ug4qzvQ6qI0V+OHPrVly/JrVMh5ZXEyqKG/jbuoRkA+cVjmpxL+b4OYP H525D2CQvmG+ot2XtDCx4L+35EHh/uA/MWBR6iPmHzeWKDyIA+F7mdTcAK6z0J8+0ZtW S6szR2N9KUt37m7yYA3LBICFzBQCP1LDWD4ewiVyQ6Zt1XtusGM/HGwTua8/5sYzFelz OS9QpShIRj3mpTrAN5qiElGX/sxc3u/kfxGBoWsWlTK+CbD9XSsuaWXxlErqu7nwywpm xPTAbnNrgUhEATN0O3soHay9wBpf/VS73ypNgicAS1DRU4wGbPp2pjzTYgG7hoBo2Cj1 FajQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=nDhvNMRzC3x7MarsLDFxu+r9QSuA8/obw4Ih98kC/Xs=; b=PQzkeTeoWAYEPQaz7Impbg9dyY0lEA2u2rXiWZkoRB6bLXDtzRMG9TJpkrOcU9y3lY dQVIrZnkjOp48qm3lG6MXKOIxxj9hqCuJUKubFkbX3mYYS1x+ZisSVdKOB/qT0qEbS22 kvacHd76Z24xZsoEzMABVovnektjsgAAqwyKps7FITC8OoxBVBP6wnraAnNi1YUKifz3 KRQUU5oCTmgP1r3cigzUDhW4nFSgWkSwavD0bP19qB+fjsfIJ4L7+yhwy4/uqzbP1wss QkfisqaqS2fTvgGuDtphpgmllwJ6G2D+4lKPbK3WQq+eWLDOEyKjwS/eSgqE64Z1rK/P U17g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h11-20020a170906854b00b0078decbc3fe4si6321309ejy.274.2022.11.07.00.48.24; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 00:48:54 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229680AbiKGIr2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 7 Nov 2022 03:47:28 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48870 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230510AbiKGIr1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2022 03:47:27 -0500 Received: from formenos.hmeau.com (helcar.hmeau.com [216.24.177.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21C40C62; Mon, 7 Nov 2022 00:47:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from loth.rohan.me.apana.org.au ([192.168.167.2]) by formenos.hmeau.com with smtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Debian)) id 1orxmH-00AyMB-Ht; Mon, 07 Nov 2022 16:47:23 +0800 Received: by loth.rohan.me.apana.org.au (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 07 Nov 2022 16:47:22 +0800 Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 16:47:22 +0800 From: Herbert Xu To: "yekai (A)" Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wangzhou1@hisilicon.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] crypto: hisilicon/qm - modify the process of regs dfx Message-ID: References: <20221105095357.21199-1-yekai13@huawei.com> <20221105095357.21199-2-yekai13@huawei.com> <45cf9fba-fae6-8279-bfac-f70110df42dc@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45cf9fba-fae6-8279-bfac-f70110df42dc@huawei.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 02:53:28PM +0800, yekai (A) wrote: > > > On 2022/11/5 18:18, Herbert Xu wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 05, 2022 at 09:53:54AM +0000, Kai Ye wrote: > >> +static void dfx_regs_uninit(struct hisi_qm *qm, > >> + struct dfx_diff_registers *dregs, int reg_len) > >> +{ > >> + int i; > >> + > >> + /* Setting the pointer is NULL to prevent double free */ > >> + for (i = 0; i < reg_len; i++) { > >> + kfree(dregs[i].regs); > >> + dregs[i].regs = NULL; > >> + } > >> + kfree(dregs); > >> + dregs = NULL; > >> +} > > The line that I complained about is still here. > > > > Cheers, > > ok Just to be clear, it's the last line "dregs = NULL" that I was referring to. It makes no sense to zero a variable that is on the stack. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt