Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 11 Nov 2022 09:07:15 -0800
From:   Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
        Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
        Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@gmail.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] sched: add sched_numa_find_nth_cpu()
Message-ID: <Y26BQ92l9xWKaz2z@yury-laptop>
References: <20221111040027.621646-1-yury.norov@gmail.com>
 <20221111040027.621646-4-yury.norov@gmail.com>
 <Y241Jd+27r/ZIiji@smile.fi.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y241Jd+27r/ZIiji@smile.fi.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 01:42:29PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 08:00:26PM -0800, Yury Norov wrote:
> > The function finds Nth set CPU in a given cpumask starting from a given
> > node.
> > 
> > Leveraging the fact that each hop in sched_domains_numa_masks includes the
> > same or greater number of CPUs than the previous one, we can use binary
> > search on hops instead of linear walk, which makes the overall complexity
> > of O(log n) in terms of number of cpumask_weight() calls.
> 
> ...
> 
> > +int sched_numa_find_nth_cpu(const struct cpumask *cpus, int cpu, int node)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned int first = 0, mid, last = sched_domains_numa_levels;
> > +	struct cpumask ***masks;
> 
> *** ?
> Hmm... Do we really need such deep indirection?

It's 2d array of pointers, so - yes.
 
> > +	int w, ret = nr_cpu_ids;
> > +
> > +	rcu_read_lock();
> > +	masks = rcu_dereference(sched_domains_numa_masks);
> > +	if (!masks)
> > +		goto out;
> > +
> > +	while (last >= first) {
> > +		mid = (last + first) / 2;
> > +
> > +		if (cpumask_weight_and(cpus, masks[mid][node]) <= cpu) {
> > +			first = mid + 1;
> > +			continue;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		w = (mid == 0) ? 0 : cpumask_weight_and(cpus, masks[mid - 1][node]);
> 
> See below.
> 
> > +		if (w <= cpu)
> > +			break;
> > +
> > +		last = mid - 1;
> > +	}
> 
> We have lib/bsearch.h. I haven't really looked deeply into the above, but my
> gut feelings that that might be useful here. Can you check that?

Yes we do. I tried it, and it didn't work because nodes arrays are
allocated dynamically, and distance between different pairs of hops
for a given node is not a constant, which is a requirement for
bsearch.

However, distance between hops pointers in 1st level array should be
constant, and we can try feeding bsearch with it. I'll experiment with
bsearch for more.

> > +	ret = (mid == 0) ?
> > +		cpumask_nth_and(cpu - w, cpus, masks[mid][node]) :
> > +		cpumask_nth_and_andnot(cpu - w, cpus, masks[mid][node], masks[mid - 1][node]);
> 
> You can also shorten this by inversing the conditional:
> 
> 	ret = mid ? ...not 0... : ...for 0...;

Yep, why not.

> > +out:
> 
> out_unlock: ?

Do you think it's better?

> > +	rcu_read_unlock();
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>