Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <788e7255-ef05-f1bf-608e-df8085304344@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Nov 2022 20:20:25 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.4.2
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] crypto: aria: implement aria-avx2 and aria-avx512
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc:     linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
        davem@davemloft.net, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
        dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
        kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, richard@nod.at,
        viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
        sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com, jpoimboe@kernel.org,
        elliott@hpe.com, x86@kernel.org, jussi.kivilinna@iki.fi,
        ebiggers@kernel.org
References: <20221121003955.2214462-1-ap420073@gmail.com>
 <Y3tJLp3UlXGmK7HB@zn.tnic>
Content-Language: en-US
From:   Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <Y3tJLp3UlXGmK7HB@zn.tnic>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Borislav,
Thank you so much for your comment!

On 11/21/22 18:47, Borislav Petkov wrote:
 > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 12:39:51AM +0000, Taehee Yoo wrote:
 >> This patchset is to implement aria-avx2 and aria-avx512.
 >> There are some differences between aria-avx, aria-avx2, and aria-avx512,
 >> but they are not core logic(s-box, diffusion layer).
 >
 > From: Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
 >
 > "Don't get discouraged - or impatient
 > ------------------------------------
 >
 > After you have submitted your change, be patient and wait.  Reviewers are
 > busy people and may not get to your patch right away.
 >
 > Once upon a time, patches used to disappear into the void without 
comment,
 > but the development process works more smoothly than that now.  You 
should
 > receive comments within a week or so; if that does not happen, make sure
 > that you have sent your patches to the right place.  Wait for a 
minimum of
 > 						     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 > one week before resubmitting or pinging reviewers - possibly longer 
during
 > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 >
 > busy times like merge windows."
 >
 > IOW, pls stop spamming with your patchset.
 >
 > Thx.
 >

Sorry for that.
After now, I will wait at least one week for review.

Thanks a lot!
Taehee Yoo