Received: by 2002:a05:6358:d09b:b0:dc:cd0c:909e with SMTP id jc27csp10179619rwb; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 01:52:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf57bU3ldQRe7fC28jkQQSsZz/DPAf/8F8BQBSTytTV35Bf5vSOqdp0PYqWWFjvpliuEhYed X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:a709:b0:79f:cd7c:e861 with SMTP id vw9-20020a170907a70900b0079fcd7ce861mr30396811ejc.339.1669369935219; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 01:52:15 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1669369935; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xQmt5M2ooPL131192WZfPnYpHZgR+7K2IikCgf8sd/AzAS66kHHz8f/xVos7UcZAdD QZ6vvy0Jd1nBQDYMrdYK0Ar+5Kv61PzyfwP6OoJwmjyGaEjRLgUmoInHkcEeeqhHrVJU 9+D1Ou6D1s3RjG4r/+Ltotry6Qyav1za3ZF2oK+3C5AZn7+BEDd2dHFtDdAHOSPpQMwa Dg6QemBbxGnHlem8Hgl6haJcX2CaDhf1Ke9BSf87EfRGNFm9kw5Vq+8+BIDxCWjRhg+r iv5ayrzcFF8QqMbkRLVdJKzqwuCiDrLGjYBwkz/a+gVjmB5mL9x4iJm83hPHRYb+ryr4 cAJQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=7ijGSBqI7h/PJ7QzJ+Ktso4l0Jy6oTzpl+q73KzuaUw=; b=jvtKjLYA/fc8x+DQJH/QgLExz7rrMlJr9I3/T3gTsQqIvYdeQFJuD28La8jhbi19K6 6WHJul2n6D0rcOlGsKqdpVSsPcHagEGKp3yEuD0QADMa8u/bSXCcS/YPBfloyisK9LOu 5VOUZT0qtKo/FtB7S/lgYn8Dmx03oGqiMhrp5pNxsgzgUybX3YrY4osgjbUKCETD8xUv lUmMBoL91f/w6WMj4vnonRr4ZAWfk6C47/JEbQtAKfVIr5aZbxjDz+HAgKd4c6bOd8QC 5LSQYdouw/oK+EJLbCHpczfqXrc+kjUrFVHdpTmh0D9Iu3MSAjhYdAED/MWft7GIGrkb jXcQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hv11-20020a17090760cb00b0077b4248b138si3371227ejc.127.2022.11.25.01.51.51; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 01:52:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229924AbiKYJtx (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 25 Nov 2022 04:49:53 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60564 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229928AbiKYJsR (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Nov 2022 04:48:17 -0500 Received: from formenos.hmeau.com (helcar.hmeau.com [216.24.177.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D84D13F044 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 01:46:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from loth.rohan.me.apana.org.au ([192.168.167.2]) by formenos.hmeau.com with smtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Debian)) id 1oyVIL-000i0D-6P; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 17:46:54 +0800 Received: by loth.rohan.me.apana.org.au (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 25 Nov 2022 17:46:53 +0800 Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 17:46:53 +0800 From: Herbert Xu To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Andrej Shadura , Jiri Kosina Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwrng: u2fzero - account for high quality RNG Message-ID: References: <20221119134259.2969204-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221119134259.2969204-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 02:42:59PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > The U2F zero apparently has a real TRNG in it with maximum quality, not > one with quality of "1", which was likely a misinterpretation of the > field as a boolean. So remove the assignment entirely, so that we get > the default quality setting. > > In the u2f-zero firmware, the 0x21 RNG command used by this driver is > handled as such [1]: > > case U2F_CUSTOM_GET_RNG: > if (atecc_send_recv(ATECC_CMD_RNG,ATECC_RNG_P1,ATECC_RNG_P2, > NULL, 0, > appdata.tmp, > sizeof(appdata.tmp), &res) == 0 ) > { > memmove(msg->pkt.init.payload, res.buf, 32); > U2FHID_SET_LEN(msg, 32); > usb_write((uint8_t*)msg, 64); > } > else > { > U2FHID_SET_LEN(msg, 0); > usb_write((uint8_t*)msg, 64); > } > > This same call to `atecc_send_recv(ATECC_CMD_RNG,ATECC_RNG_P1, > ATECC_RNG_P2,...)` is then also used in the token's cryptographically > critical "u2f_new_keypair" function, as its rather straightforward > source of random bytes [2]: > > int8_t u2f_new_keypair(uint8_t * handle, uint8_t * appid, uint8_t * pubkey) > { > struct atecc_response res; > uint8_t private_key[36]; > int i; > > watchdog(); > > if (atecc_send_recv(ATECC_CMD_RNG,ATECC_RNG_P1,ATECC_RNG_P2, > NULL, 0, > appdata.tmp, > sizeof(appdata.tmp), &res) != 0 ) > { > return -1; > } > > So it seems rather plain that the ATECC RNG is considered to provide > good random numbers. > > [1] https://github.com/conorpp/u2f-zero/blob/master/firmware/src/custom.c > [2] https://github.com/conorpp/u2f-zero/blob/master/firmware/src/u2f_atecc.c > > Cc: Andrej Shadura > Cc: Jiri Kosina > Cc: Herbert Xu > Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld > --- > drivers/hid/hid-u2fzero.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) Patch applied. Thanks. -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt