Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of amd.com designates
 165.204.84.17 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
 client-ip=165.204.84.17; helo=SATLEXMB04.amd.com; pr=C
From:   Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
To:     <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
CC:     <linux-coco@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        <mingo@redhat.com>, <jroedel@suse.de>, <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
        <hpa@zytor.com>, <ardb@kernel.org>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        <seanjc@google.com>, <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        <wanpengli@tencent.com>, <jmattson@google.com>, <luto@kernel.org>,
        <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <slp@redhat.com>,
        <pgonda@google.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
        <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>, <rientjes@google.com>,
        <dovmurik@linux.ibm.com>, <tobin@ibm.com>, <bp@alien8.de>,
        <vbabka@suse.cz>, <kirill@shutemov.name>, <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        <tony.luck@intel.com>, <marcorr@google.com>,
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
        <alpergun@google.com>, <dgilbert@redhat.com>, <jarkko@kernel.org>,
        <ashish.kalra@amd.com>, <harald@profian.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v7 12/64] KVM: SEV: Implement .fault_is_private callback
Date:   Wed, 14 Dec 2022 13:40:04 -0600
Message-ID: <20221214194056.161492-13-michael.roth@amd.com>
In-Reply-To: <20221214194056.161492-1-michael.roth@amd.com>
References: <20221214194056.161492-1-michael.roth@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Dec 2022 19:48:08.1273
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 169c56e7-7792-4b86-c9ad-08dade0c1fe1
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d;Ip=[165.204.84.17];Helo=[SATLEXMB04.amd.com]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BL02EPF0000EE3E.namprd05.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM4PR12MB5868
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
        DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
        RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham
        autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org

KVM MMU will use this to determine whether an #NPF should be serviced
with restricted memory or not.

Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c |  2 ++
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
index ae4920aeb281..6579ed218f6a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
@@ -3179,3 +3179,26 @@ void sev_vcpu_deliver_sipi_vector(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 vector)
 
 	ghcb_set_sw_exit_info_2(svm->sev_es.ghcb, 1);
 }
+
+int sev_fault_is_private(struct kvm *kvm, gpa_t gpa, u64 error_code, bool *private_fault)
+{
+	gfn_t gfn = gpa_to_gfn(gpa);
+
+	if (!kvm_is_upm_enabled(kvm) || !sev_guest(kvm))
+		goto out_unhandled;
+
+	/*
+	 * For SEV, the hypervisor is not aware of implicit conversions in the
+	 * guest, so it relies purely on explicit conversions via
+	 * KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL, so the resulting handling by userspace should
+	 * update the backing memory source accordingly. Therefore, the backing
+	 * source is the only indicator of whether the fault should be treated
+	 * as private or not.
+	 */
+	*private_fault = kvm_mem_is_private(kvm, gfn);
+
+	return 1;
+
+out_unhandled:
+	return 0;
+}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index 7f3e4d91c0c6..fc7885869f7e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -4830,6 +4830,8 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops __initdata = {
 
 	.vcpu_deliver_sipi_vector = svm_vcpu_deliver_sipi_vector,
 	.vcpu_get_apicv_inhibit_reasons = avic_vcpu_get_apicv_inhibit_reasons,
+
+	.fault_is_private = sev_fault_is_private,
 };
 
 /*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
index 4826e6cc611b..c760ec51a910 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
@@ -683,6 +683,8 @@ void sev_vcpu_deliver_sipi_vector(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u8 vector);
 void sev_es_prepare_switch_to_guest(struct sev_es_save_area *hostsa);
 void sev_es_unmap_ghcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm);
 
+int sev_fault_is_private(struct kvm *kvm, gpa_t gpa, u64 error_code, bool *private_fault);
+
 /* vmenter.S */
 
 void __svm_sev_es_vcpu_run(struct vcpu_svm *svm, bool spec_ctrl_intercepted);
-- 
2.25.1