Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 20 Dec 2022 11:50:47 +0800
From:   Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, corbet@lwn.net, will@kernel.org,
        boqun.feng@gmail.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
        catalin.marinas@arm.com, dennis@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org,
        cl@linux.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
        agordeev@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com,
        svens@linux.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net, tglx@linutronix.de,
        mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
        x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, joro@8bytes.org,
        suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
        dwmw2@infradead.org, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, penberg@kernel.org,
        rientjes@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, vbabka@suse.cz,
        roman.gushchin@linux.dev, 42.hyeyoo@gmail.com,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 01/12] crypto: Remove u128 usage
Message-ID: <Y6ExF8mchgYiiRB0@gondor.apana.org.au>
References: <20221219153525.632521981@infradead.org>
 <20221219154118.889543494@infradead.org>
 <Y6CJsWBhcbKatZNg@zx2c4.com>
 <Y6CYu4skFFMopU+g@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <CAHmME9oCBgNCfYFxirA-fdarGip5MvOG-iUxT=2HC=iSXRMH-Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9oCBgNCfYFxirA-fdarGip5MvOG-iUxT=2HC=iSXRMH-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 06:03:04PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>
> Is there a patch at the end of the series that adds it back in to use u128?

Could we do some ifdef trickery to reduce the amount of code churn
please? Changing everything away from u128 and then back to it seems
silly.

Thanks,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt