Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 22 Dec 2022 13:26:25 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Cc:     kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
        jroedel@suse.de, thomas.lendacky@amd.com, hpa@zytor.com,
        ardb@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com,
        vkuznets@redhat.com, wanpengli@tencent.com, jmattson@google.com,
        luto@kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, slp@redhat.com,
        pgonda@google.com, peterz@infradead.org,
        srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com, rientjes@google.com,
        dovmurik@linux.ibm.com, tobin@ibm.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
        kirill@shutemov.name, ak@linux.intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
        marcorr@google.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com,
        alpergun@google.com, dgilbert@redhat.com, jarkko@kernel.org,
        ashish.kalra@amd.com, harald@profian.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v7 02/64] KVM: x86: Add
 KVM_CAP_UNMAPPED_PRIVATE_MEMORY
Message-ID: <Y6RM8RRryLgK8KiB@zn.tnic>
References: <20221214194056.161492-1-michael.roth@amd.com>
 <20221214194056.161492-3-michael.roth@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20221214194056.161492-3-michael.roth@amd.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 01:39:54PM -0600, Michael Roth wrote:
> This mainly indicates to KVM that it should expect all private guest
> memory to be backed by private memslots. Ideally this would work
> similarly for others archs, give or take a few additional flags, but
> for now it's a simple boolean indicator for x86.

...

> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> index c7e9d375a902..cc9424ccf9b2 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -1219,6 +1219,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_resize_hpt {
>  #define KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING_ACQ_REL 223
>  #define KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED_ASYNC_DISABLE 224
>  #define KVM_CAP_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES 225
> +#define KVM_CAP_UNMAPPED_PRIVATE_MEM 240

Isn't this new cap supposed to be documented somewhere in
Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst ?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette