Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 4 Jan 2023 12:12:41 +0000
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To:     Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Cc:     kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
        jroedel@suse.de, thomas.lendacky@amd.com, hpa@zytor.com,
        ardb@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com,
        vkuznets@redhat.com, wanpengli@tencent.com, jmattson@google.com,
        luto@kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, slp@redhat.com,
        pgonda@google.com, peterz@infradead.org,
        srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com, rientjes@google.com,
        dovmurik@linux.ibm.com, tobin@ibm.com, bp@alien8.de,
        vbabka@suse.cz, kirill@shutemov.name, ak@linux.intel.com,
        tony.luck@intel.com, marcorr@google.com,
        sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com, alpergun@google.com,
        dgilbert@redhat.com, ashish.kalra@amd.com, harald@profian.com,
        Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v7 25/64] crypto: ccp: Add support to initialize the
 AMD-SP for SEV-SNP
Message-ID: <Y7VtOQa5Hd0oMdfh@kernel.org>
References: <20221214194056.161492-1-michael.roth@amd.com>
 <20221214194056.161492-26-michael.roth@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20221214194056.161492-26-michael.roth@amd.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 01:40:17PM -0600, Michael Roth wrote:
> +	/*
> +	 * If boot CPU supports SNP, then first attempt to initialize
> +	 * the SNP firmware.
> +	 */
> +	if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SEV_SNP)) {
> +		if (!sev_version_greater_or_equal(SNP_MIN_API_MAJOR, SNP_MIN_API_MINOR)) {
> +			dev_err(sev->dev, "SEV-SNP support requires firmware version >= %d:%d\n",
> +				SNP_MIN_API_MAJOR, SNP_MIN_API_MINOR);
> +		} else {
> +			rc = sev_snp_init(&error, true);
> +			if (rc) {
> +				/*
> +				 * Don't abort the probe if SNP INIT failed,
> +				 * continue to initialize the legacy SEV firmware.
> +				 */
> +				dev_err(sev->dev, "SEV-SNP: failed to INIT error %#x\n", error);
> +			}
> +		}
> +	}

I think this is not right as there is a dep between sev init and this,
and there is about a dozen of call sites already __sev_platform_init_locked().

Instead there should be __sev_snp_init_locked() that would be called as
part of __sev_platform_init_locked() flow.

Also TMR allocation should be moved inside __sev_platform_init_locked,
given that it needs to be marked into RMP after SNP init.

BR, Jarkko