Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Sender: Ingo Molnar <mingo.kernel.org@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Jan 2023 21:25:59 +0100
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        patches@lists.linux.dev, tglx@linutronix.de,
        linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
        x86@kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>,
        Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>,
        Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 1/7] x86: lib: Separate instruction decoder MMIO type
 from MMIO trace
Message-ID: <Y7Xg19H39FqTwyEL@gmail.com>
References: <20230101162910.710293-1-Jason@zx2c4.com>
 <20230101162910.710293-2-Jason@zx2c4.com>
 <Y7QELo9etPM8Tpx5@gmail.com>
 <Y7RA3bmko0AjO8hQ@zx2c4.com>
 <Y7RfPnyK/25pxpKs@gmail.com>
 <Y7RmDVI/ScoeBO2a@zn.tnic>
 <CAHmME9ohJ3JZNjkxuA0KjFW0LLQksgQP5f8bfrogd3+GmLrpKw@mail.gmail.com>
 <Y7RqQNH0OuiYCDeE@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y7RqQNH0OuiYCDeE@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:

> 
> * Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 6:29 PM Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 06:00:46PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > > I guess you missed the conversation with Borislav yesterday about that.
> > > > > He mentioned that I'd just take it through random.git when this whole
> > > > > series goes in.
> > > >
> > > > Please base your tree off on tip:x86/asm then (or pull it in) - it only
> > >
> > > My idea was a lot simpler: avoid the tree inter-dependency by us acking this
> > > patch so that it can go through the random.git tree.
> > 
> > Indeed I would prefer this.
> > 
> > Or... just put this in 6.2 because it's trivial anyway? Heck, even mark 
> > it as stable@ so make future backporting easier. Then it'll meet tip's 
> > urgent criteria.
> 
> Yeah - that's sensible too, it does fix a header namespace bug - I've put 
> it into tip:x86/urgent.

This namespace clash fix is now upstream as of 512dee0c00ad & later kernels.

Thanks,

	Ingo