Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of amd.com designates
 165.204.84.17 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
 client-ip=165.204.84.17; helo=SATLEXMB04.amd.com; pr=C
Date:   Wed, 4 Jan 2023 11:21:05 -0600
From:   Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
CC:     <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-coco@lists.linux.dev>,
        <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
        <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <jroedel@suse.de>,
        <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>, <ardb@kernel.org>,
        <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <seanjc@google.com>, <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        <wanpengli@tencent.com>, <jmattson@google.com>, <luto@kernel.org>,
        <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <slp@redhat.com>,
        <pgonda@google.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
        <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>, <rientjes@google.com>,
        <dovmurik@linux.ibm.com>, <tobin@ibm.com>, <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        <kirill@shutemov.name>, <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        <tony.luck@intel.com>, <marcorr@google.com>,
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
        <alpergun@google.com>, <dgilbert@redhat.com>, <jarkko@kernel.org>,
        <ashish.kalra@amd.com>, <harald@profian.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v7 00/64] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP)
 Hypervisor Support
Message-ID: <20230104172105.tke5opbywcgq2fzl@amd.com>
References: <20221214194056.161492-1-michael.roth@amd.com>
 <Y6YQjJyoxKC5hfij@zn.tnic>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Y6YQjJyoxKC5hfij@zn.tnic>
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jan 2023 02:57:44.1838
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 7b619d84-6b30-48c5-3c31-08daeec89e46
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d;Ip=[165.204.84.17];Helo=[SATLEXMB04.amd.com]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM6NAM11FT051.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BL1PR12MB5254
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,
        DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
        RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no
        autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 09:33:16PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 01:39:52PM -0600, Michael Roth wrote:
> > This patchset is based on top of the following patchset:
> > 
> >   "[PATCH v10 0/9] KVM: mm: fd-based approach for supporting KVM"
> >   https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kernel.org%2Flkml%2F20221202061347.1070246-1-chao.p.peng%40linux.intel.com%2FT%2F%23me1dd3a4c295758b4e4ac8ff600f2db055bc5f987&data=05%7C01%7Cmichael.roth%40amd.com%7Ce778b913794d41ca7a1b08dae524f21c%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C638074244202143178%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=rhjtuPIYWrTN%2FtPHOb2HM5GGZ5cgHRCGVoqu8N1f7XY%3D&reserved=0
> 
> Well, not quite.
> 
> There's also this thing which is stuck in there:
> 
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kernel.org%2Fr%2F20221205232341.4131240-1-vannapurve%40google.com&data=05%7C01%7Cmichael.roth%40amd.com%7Ce778b913794d41ca7a1b08dae524f21c%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C638074244202143178%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=L20ayS1IDUCuOjrs2HzVApzf5%2BmW48PhcsnZprn1RIM%3D&reserved=0
> 
> and I would appreciate reading that in the 0th message so that I don't
> scratch my head over why don't those patches apply and what else is
> missing...

That's correct, sorry for the confusion. With UPM v9 those tests were included
on top so when I ported to v10 I failed to recall it was now a separate
patchset I'd added on top.

-Mike

> 
> -- 
> Regards/Gruss,
>     Boris.
> 
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpeople.kernel.org%2Ftglx%2Fnotes-about-netiquette&data=05%7C01%7Cmichael.roth%40amd.com%7Ce778b913794d41ca7a1b08dae524f21c%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C638074244202143178%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=q4TNZvaptVOEPnx%2B6FJpg64v%2BUya14kO6PX1U422JXE%3D&reserved=0