Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 16 Jan 2023 16:06:38 +0800
From:   Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] crypto: Accelerated GCM for IPSec on ARM/arm64
Message-ID: <Y8UFjlyFqg+uddZ5@gondor.apana.org.au>
References: <20221214171957.2833419-1-ardb@kernel.org>
 <CAMj1kXG_btjHUVpN9m5NoBdFv=3JWt-piPx_u40KTv70CC-sRQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <Y8TEqNJuEmWE5Tg/@gondor.apana.org.au>
 <CAMj1kXExpt4U64ncX6wSU_0zLNNQGiP3RFGNbAXwpuBjeV=fPg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMj1kXExpt4U64ncX6wSU_0zLNNQGiP3RFGNbAXwpuBjeV=fPg@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 08:40:09AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> Will you be taking the rest of the series? (patches #2 - #4). Or we
> might defer this to v6.4 entirely it if makes things easier. (The
> other changes really shouldn't go through the ARM tree)

I had assumed they were dependent.  But they do seem to make sense
on their own so yes I can certainly take patches 2-4.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt