From:   Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
To:     Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@gmail.com>,
        Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Haniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
        Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
        Peter Lafreniere <peter@n8pjl.ca>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc:     linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/9] sched: cpumask: improve on
 cpumask_local_spread() locality
In-Reply-To: <4dc2a367-d3b1-e73e-5f42-166e9cf84bac@gmail.com>
References: <20230121042436.2661843-1-yury.norov@gmail.com>
 <4dc2a367-d3b1-e73e-5f42-166e9cf84bac@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2023 09:57:43 +0000
Message-ID: <xhsmhv8kxh8tk.mognet@vschneid.remote.csb>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On 22/01/23 14:57, Tariq Toukan wrote:
> On 21/01/2023 6:24, Yury Norov wrote:
>>
>> This series was supposed to be included in v6.2, but that didn't happen. It
>> spent enough in -next without any issues, so I hope we'll finally see it
>> in v6.3.
>>
>> I believe, the best way would be moving it with scheduler patches, but I'm
>> OK to try again with bitmap branch as well.
>
> Now that Yury dropped several controversial bitmap patches form the PR,
> the rest are mostly in sched, or new API that's used by sched.
>
> Valentin, what do you think? Can you take it to your sched branch?
>

I would if I had one :-)

Peter/Ingo, any objections to stashing this in tip/sched/core?