Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16F2C636D6 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 13:27:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229726AbjBPN1a (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2023 08:27:30 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40436 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229504AbjBPN13 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2023 08:27:29 -0500 Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F41AF3C78A; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 05:27:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1676554049; x=1708090049; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CEM0w1UDoLyzR0b0tmmtouGGH6aqxvMrAbjlA9AnySA=; b=iJfs44Ye4o+O8VUdW5fIpfQBthmqpePGTYW0v0UwCoY+V1qFL3UvcEmb 72wCgFNpQ23CfrefdbPYrD5xuKeQAnCYUw1410QowJQtlEKSJAVHIIkDv rMgTErmJA64eVkh8O+sGeo6nEWxTSNg1kz2HoZ4RbnxYDdLTpRWsSxR3Z rrSWjbRCg1uy0BqCYPnY45FGHkkFWWZLOIdpNSiP0llqpcoyMKB0ve83M LAm7i+ga4jz5PBHZm9uFb/QDJ1DeJXdUoHK6fKgCLQyXjpv4Yh/lhOn85 LWAM593Z5Qr4+SnbSy38G6JnYBT/KqOaaJ6HI0BigGog7CW9AtbTbLYUw w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10623"; a="329434353" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,302,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="329434353" Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Feb 2023 05:27:28 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10623"; a="663453310" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,302,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="663453310" Received: from mylly.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.72.67]) ([10.237.72.67]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Feb 2023 05:27:24 -0800 Message-ID: <703033aa-1293-307d-42a2-9734a51c7190@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 15:27:23 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/102.0 Thunderbird/102.7.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] i2c: designware: Use PCI PSP driver for communication To: Mario Limonciello , =?UTF-8?B?SmFuIETEhWJyb8Wb?= , Grzegorz Bernacki , Thomas Rijo-john , Lendacky Thomas , herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20230209223811.4993-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com> <20230209223811.4993-7-mario.limonciello@amd.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Jarkko Nikula In-Reply-To: <20230209223811.4993-7-mario.limonciello@amd.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On 2/10/23 00:38, Mario Limonciello wrote: > Currently the PSP semaphore communication base address is discovered > by using an MSR that is not architecturally guaranteed for future > platforms. Also the mailbox that is utilized for communication with > the PSP may have other consumers in the kernel, so it's better to > make all communication go through a single driver. > > Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig | 2 +- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdpsp.c | 141 +------------------- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-core.h | 1 - > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 1 - > include/linux/psp-platform-access.h | 1 + > 5 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 137 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig > index a7bfddf08fa7b..9e2202ca73ec7 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig > @@ -566,9 +566,9 @@ config I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM > > config I2C_DESIGNWARE_AMDPSP > bool "AMD PSP I2C semaphore support" > - depends on X86_MSR > depends on ACPI > depends on I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM > + depends on CRYPTO_DEV_SP_PSP && !(I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM=y && CRYPTO_DEV_CCP_DD=m) > help Would this look better if split? I.e. depends on CRYPTO_DEV_SP_PSP depends on !(I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM=y && CRYPTO_DEV_CCP_DD=m)