Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1BCC74A5B for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 09:22:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231146AbjCQJWL (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Mar 2023 05:22:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59596 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230301AbjCQJWK (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Mar 2023 05:22:10 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com (mail-ed1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0CE6B421E for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 02:22:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id eg48so17690594edb.13 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 02:22:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1679044927; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nsHFbM31p4aG2NzU6pYJrvN8mc9wOJaxONeK5EJ0yBk=; b=NZFKWGNHrB/onuIrzQib8AmrVjFUNprwpo1xdl/8hS0tnGtLfqpa3t+tpA5DqfYzAF RE73ioNVxXmBqQvisjhlkEdcLm0dbDZgYQWmn8dPR8xgLcCaDMhuTP7gBf1RToz3TdHk cKDWIEEXf3BF/wAcdNbY0tAZk0Ls7R3xI2qUrBie+P2vtFN+WB3g1ec+btKjR9RmbQVG TnJHGCf1XHV9TVyLwmg/k1FC37PhmdZU7HbipyclPw2YNZJXL2gYcpHtNCnkjuCM7ChR iVoyW/UY8c585YsXeAS8rR4eaK1DrmF5hrq0oLs+jVPtZr0uTustud0tp7bdSeReCs4w R17g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1679044927; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nsHFbM31p4aG2NzU6pYJrvN8mc9wOJaxONeK5EJ0yBk=; b=rT1ALc5KhsVpJu+elSYTjlLrQY+ikVxQWw/fIrQylVRqG1le07q1TNN+GvZPU26Rk5 XGxpzIleCeHKEk+nwm+oN8s7VOP7QoWq0Qv2b84CYEFq9ihtWdtNr/NxO3NQrhve69SI /qHdDKiI9Q3sXAlHFXGNKujjsW6Jahim/9xaV85kzo3f8WbgAQM7zUhoWZUtrZJsTbGt gRHnBXrDNoq7hilkjAPo/48TYkW/BGDsR4xZWl1MSISlN4++bC9BEHhRIEJ++hioyazN n+MI+eG42iYIyWtVTIFbVTOrYzAOME/h4hzPKRUSGUq46QOOIv0bY/NgVEf/MaRFNJRw tMRg== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKU+iOJ+GZzkqCECHI4DMePAZzViPG9gTJijmGOoFJFZU5HLRIny b0zLXyvV6yOL/kQnRCy1fSS+Uw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set9IrUtS0MYoDpyUE9kUDDV8lJU7DfdO4dwR1skLJr+3VbeFqBnq5yZdMh1F1GsvAQSFdds7Mw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2cc6:b0:930:d30a:6c20 with SMTP id hg6-20020a1709072cc600b00930d30a6c20mr5834516ejc.17.1679044927382; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 02:22:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2a02:810d:15c0:828:848a:1971:93e0:b465? ([2a02:810d:15c0:828:848a:1971:93e0:b465]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j10-20020a170906094a00b008cafeec917dsm745003ejd.101.2023.03.17.02.22.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 17 Mar 2023 02:22:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 10:22:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] crypto - img-hash: Drop of_match_ptr for ID table Content-Language: en-US To: Herbert Xu Cc: "David S. Miller" , Nicolas Ferre , Alexandre Belloni , Claudiu Beznea , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20230310223027.315954-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> <20230310223027.315954-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On 17/03/2023 10:15, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 10:01:44AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> >> That's not true. There is no waste because having it on x86 allows to >> match via ACPI PRP0001. It's on purpose there. > > Alright how about this, I don't have any OF devices on my machine > yet this structure is still taking up the extra memory for every > single device driver. This is wrong. > >> There are OF-drivers used on ACPI and x86/arm64. > > Well then they should be selecting OF and everyone will be happy. OK, I will change it. It's a bit tiring to discuss the same concept with different maintainers and each time receive different point of view or each time need to convince that the other way is preferred. I already had such talks with Mark, so it is just easier change patch. Also, I tend to keep forgetting all the arguments. :) Let me just share also other maintainer's point of view: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=0e62470652fa https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230311183534.1d0dfd64@jic23-huawei/ Anyway, I appreciate your feedback and thank you for picking up the first patch. I'll rework this one. Have a nice day! Best regards, Krzysztof