Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 5 May 2023 23:05:04 +0000
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To:     "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
        dm-devel@redhat.com, gmazyland@gmail.com, luto@kernel.org,
        dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, bp@suse.de,
        mingo@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
        ardb@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, bernie.keany@intel.com,
        charishma1.gairuboyina@intel.com,
        lalithambika.krishnakumar@intel.com,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/12] x86/cpu/keylocker: Load an internal wrapping
 key at boot-time
Message-ID: <ZFWLoOZZTnBrid+7@gmail.com>
References: <20220112211258.21115-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
 <20230410225936.8940-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
 <20230410225936.8940-8-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230410225936.8940-8-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 03:59:31PM -0700, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/keylocker.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/keylocker.h
> index e85dfb6c1524..820ac29c06d9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/keylocker.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/keylocker.h
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>  
>  #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>  
> +#include <asm/processor.h>
>  #include <linux/bits.h>
>  #include <asm/fpu/types.h>
>  
> @@ -28,5 +29,13 @@ struct iwkey {
>  #define KEYLOCKER_CPUID_EBX_WIDE	BIT(2)
>  #define KEYLOCKER_CPUID_EBX_BACKUP	BIT(4)
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_KEYLOCKER
> +void setup_keylocker(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
> +void destroy_keylocker_data(void);
> +#else
> +#define setup_keylocker(c) do { } while (0)
> +#define destroy_keylocker_data() do { } while (0)
> +#endif

Shouldn't the !CONFIG_X86_KEYLOCKER stubs be static inline functions instead of
macros, so that type checking works?

- Eric