Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp5525281rwd; Wed, 24 May 2023 03:09:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5Rvk6OO5O6ZuOwFgfu/Nofl1gGhC6+DL42sldyL8z0VjqJyNNEYqNHP6klUj769ALu9jdN X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ec85:b0:1af:c57d:1c7b with SMTP id x5-20020a170902ec8500b001afc57d1c7bmr6302862plg.32.1684922957535; Wed, 24 May 2023 03:09:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1684922957; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Yu4wYyZZncYxGoPImtp0NUWAaYk5NE+qOVv0+NTXcmZYRxKKol15XA9a0+QJffWXBW IskhNRt4DNsg/Cg7eNACN4TlH1XDG2+NgfrfYDX88ItNuKYOWh2oFTz3/8l9veW95uvx +v3wJOKBB0YeZrfyHVjEmOd4i2HL9EhyBZD8fmbsVrrME2SOXs/I62wOuzl35yPtOiRc QdhdGav3dBXWSXP0cpi10jGwSpVGudc5gNJai+bTdJpdg3IyfOnpNkYmw+9jgL9cUJRL Lag9RX934nzARm0OjilwKXLUi3D+SSR98ZJEezFwf/2ZbFDf/+32wDeYB0bPrEGG22o6 GNQg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=knM5eQHXaPGpC2TIS8D/AKEO1kOlkiFoaSG9BryqIas=; b=LisCaEO9szagTLLIxTqCErAimd+gppDW3f9SHI98Fa75ve5H9B5v3UVXMl/1ZsCpVE Us3UukAyFp1Q199Zv8ahDmUzguHM0a8IQGua9Crha9YLpN0YLqwgV2kBkkFYFnNgNouG Lt7S6AkA5HB6ghdxdQ/aY8EUuK5+A7ZmzFG5/V7/7FHLIelYcgke30XfLyu1icMLMJnI l1kYOe62X8aoOTPecbwmERGmp8lIrBo+dcPAq1PLak3ZGCt0n+nQHS07mZLJoxeWBwoo BNsHJk3OF5bAoWbHnP9Mo5i8F7qOlqdhpP6WunJmX31kY/5z++OxtbDIb9gkGOwu4xV/ ki4w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a10-20020a170902ee8a00b001ae44cd96basi1835259pld.312.2023.05.24.03.09.01; Wed, 24 May 2023 03:09:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229459AbjEXJ4Y (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 24 May 2023 05:56:24 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36232 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229448AbjEXJ4X (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 May 2023 05:56:23 -0400 Received: from 167-179-156-38.a7b39c.syd.nbn.aussiebb.net (167-179-156-38.a7b39c.syd.nbn.aussiebb.net [167.179.156.38]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F18C19E; Wed, 24 May 2023 02:56:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from loth.rohan.me.apana.org.au ([192.168.167.2]) by formenos.hmeau.com with smtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Debian)) id 1q1lDy-00Ckbo-Ar; Wed, 24 May 2023 17:56:07 +0800 Received: by loth.rohan.me.apana.org.au (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 24 May 2023 17:56:06 +0800 Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 17:56:06 +0800 From: Herbert Xu To: Bharat Bhushan Cc: olivia@selenic.com, Jason@zx2c4.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sgoutham@marvell.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwrng: cn10k: Add extended trng register support Message-ID: References: <20230518064734.18819-1-bbhushan2@marvell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230518064734.18819-1-bbhushan2@marvell.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2, RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TVD_RCVD_IP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 12:17:34PM +0530, Bharat Bhushan wrote: > > -static void cn10k_read_trng(struct cn10k_rng *rng, u64 *value) > +static size_t cn10k_read_trng(struct cn10k_rng *rng, u64 *value) Since the return value is either 0 or 8, why did you pick size_t as the return value? > { > + u16 retry_count = 0; > u64 upper, lower; > + u64 status; > + > + if (rng->extended_trng_regs) { > + do { > + *value = readq(rng->reg_base + RNM_PF_TRNG_DAT); > + if (*value) > + return 8; > + status = readq(rng->reg_base + RNM_PF_TRNG_RES); > + if (!status && (retry_count++ > 0x1000)) > + return 0; > + } while (!status); > + } > > *value = readq(rng->reg_base + RNM_PF_RANDOM); > > @@ -82,6 +130,7 @@ static void cn10k_read_trng(struct cn10k_rng *rng, u64 *value) > > *value = (upper & 0xFFFFFFFF00000000) | (lower & 0xFFFFFFFF); > } > + return 8; > } > > static int cn10k_rng_read(struct hwrng *hwrng, void *data, > @@ -100,7 +149,9 @@ static int cn10k_rng_read(struct hwrng *hwrng, void *data, > size = max; > > while (size >= 8) { > - cn10k_read_trng(rng, &value); > + err = cn10k_read_trng(rng, &value); > + if (!err) > + goto out; It appears that err is either 8 or 0, so it's not really an error. Could you plesae use a more meaningful name for this variable? Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt