Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of amd.com designates
 165.204.84.17 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
 client-ip=165.204.84.17; helo=SATLEXMB04.amd.com; pr=C
From:   Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
To:     <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
CC:     <linux-coco@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        <mingo@redhat.com>, <jroedel@suse.de>, <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
        <hpa@zytor.com>, <ardb@kernel.org>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        <seanjc@google.com>, <vkuznets@redhat.com>, <jmattson@google.com>,
        <luto@kernel.org>, <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <slp@redhat.com>,
        <pgonda@google.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
        <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>, <rientjes@google.com>,
        <dovmurik@linux.ibm.com>, <tobin@ibm.com>, <bp@alien8.de>,
        <vbabka@suse.cz>, <kirill@shutemov.name>, <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        <tony.luck@intel.com>, <marcorr@google.com>,
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
        <alpergun@google.com>, <dgilbert@redhat.com>, <jarkko@kernel.org>,
        <ashish.kalra@amd.com>, <nikunj.dadhania@amd.com>,
        <liam.merwick@oracle.com>, <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>,
        Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v9 11/51] x86/traps: Define RMP violation #PF error code
Date:   Sun, 11 Jun 2023 23:25:19 -0500
Message-ID: <20230612042559.375660-12-michael.roth@amd.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230612042559.375660-1-michael.roth@amd.com>
References: <20230612042559.375660-1-michael.roth@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jun 2023 04:28:22.9348
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: e27b4765-fac9-42fc-d1e5-08db6afd7553
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d;Ip=[165.204.84.17];Helo=[SATLEXMB04.amd.com]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: CY4PEPF0000E9CD.namprd03.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DS0PR12MB7560
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
        DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FORGED_SPF_HELO,
        RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE,
        T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org

From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>

Bit 31 in the page fault-error bit will be set when processor encounters
an RMP violation.

While at it, use the BIT_ULL() macro.

Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Signed-off by: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h | 18 +++++++++++-------
 arch/x86/mm/fault.c            |  1 +
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h
index 10b1de500ab1..295be06f8db7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/trap_pf.h
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
 #ifndef _ASM_X86_TRAP_PF_H
 #define _ASM_X86_TRAP_PF_H
 
+#include <linux/bits.h>  /* BIT() macro */
+
 /*
  * Page fault error code bits:
  *
@@ -12,15 +14,17 @@
  *   bit 4 ==				1: fault was an instruction fetch
  *   bit 5 ==				1: protection keys block access
  *   bit 15 ==				1: SGX MMU page-fault
+ *   bit 31 ==				1: fault was due to RMP violation
  */
 enum x86_pf_error_code {
-	X86_PF_PROT	=		1 << 0,
-	X86_PF_WRITE	=		1 << 1,
-	X86_PF_USER	=		1 << 2,
-	X86_PF_RSVD	=		1 << 3,
-	X86_PF_INSTR	=		1 << 4,
-	X86_PF_PK	=		1 << 5,
-	X86_PF_SGX	=		1 << 15,
+	X86_PF_PROT	=		BIT(0),
+	X86_PF_WRITE	=		BIT(1),
+	X86_PF_USER	=		BIT(2),
+	X86_PF_RSVD	=		BIT(3),
+	X86_PF_INSTR	=		BIT(4),
+	X86_PF_PK	=		BIT(5),
+	X86_PF_SGX	=		BIT(15),
+	X86_PF_RMP	=		BIT(31),
 };
 
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_TRAP_PF_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index a498ae1fbe66..95791071e3cd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -546,6 +546,7 @@ show_fault_oops(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, unsigned long ad
 		 !(error_code & X86_PF_PROT) ? "not-present page" :
 		 (error_code & X86_PF_RSVD)  ? "reserved bit violation" :
 		 (error_code & X86_PF_PK)    ? "protection keys violation" :
+		 (error_code & X86_PF_RMP)   ? "RMP violation" :
 					       "permissions violation");
 
 	if (!(error_code & X86_PF_USER) && user_mode(regs)) {
-- 
2.25.1