Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <7ceba3df-bee8-9f1d-a27d-85e0b5f35d83@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 23 Jun 2023 14:53:45 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.12.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/4] dt-bindings: qcom-qce: add SoC compatible string
 for ipq9574
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Anusha Rao <quic_anusha@quicinc.com>
Cc:     agross@kernel.org, andersson@kernel.org, bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org,
        conor+dt@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
        konrad.dybcio@linaro.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        mturquette@baylibre.com, p.zabel@pengutronix.de,
        quic_arajkuma@quicinc.com, quic_gokulsri@quicinc.com,
        quic_kathirav@quicinc.com, quic_poovendh@quicinc.com,
        quic_sjaganat@quicinc.com, quic_srichara@quicinc.com,
        robh+dt@kernel.org, sboyd@kernel.org, thara.gopinath@gmail.com
References: <20230526161129.1454-4-quic_anusha@quicinc.com>
 <20230623115525.7300-1-quic_anusha@quicinc.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230623115525.7300-1-quic_anusha@quicinc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 23/06/2023 13:55, Anusha Rao wrote:
>> Document the compatible string for ipq9574.
>>
>> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Anusha Rao <quic_anusha@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>>  Changes in V4:
>> 	- Picked up Reviewed-by tag.
> 
> A gentle reminder to pick the dt-binding patch.
> As the dts change is picked, this patch is required to resolve dt-bindings check issues.

One patchset with four patches targeting three different subsystems, so
no wonder it gets missed. You will usually receive better results with
splitting such patchsets per subsystems.

One more thing is lack of proper subject prefix which indicates the
subsystem. Without it why anyone would pick it up? For example me, I
would just ignore it for my subsystem...

Best regards,
Krzysztof