Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp32050196rwd; Fri, 7 Jul 2023 08:03:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlEKqfdI8gDZIjpKzm9zI1OSqGYeXt84YpIkJllelSXqQTmVthQ1TxkoxemqV0Y7vm7fxZoz X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9886:0:b0:2b6:a662:b879 with SMTP id b6-20020a2e9886000000b002b6a662b879mr3133421ljj.3.1688742212514; Fri, 07 Jul 2023 08:03:32 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1688742212; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LBOOuW6uebW372sVKIn+A/IHVb93b+7AhW0VqxkthSUD32f+wI48E24arMGCmE+upU F4vQXRq+0vsAuvqMMWe13N4+iyVkjtTv5TtFIkVacmlYQZDqtBrULljpFKoJXG3Bt4bg auROkPB5MS26mn8AmiOD63GcO+e0asjgvtkeOKaE4OmT6+IUw9dETOjkSMqzy5a8Gren 1EcNA9GVouwr8PfSvrKKfCNqBMCQP2mq3tZEdv+PsWVVUzM0/sSLqDos+VRCd6uLIWss KL4B1Ttc5GqlMU6pDsTlo0/+uFHVzWN7L3MvmUAzJhJIEriujnMRz5T1jvXS9petpSpY UgOw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=eB9IoGWCIUvegW/ZzAcyhVetJXSpsKaIqIGV4oOGh/c=; fh=r+fDQ3zMZ1beVSbI6NuRTIRDelmt9JuUXV8Y/2REiGU=; b=L1ogIlVlcQMbUgyVfxVFS8Xub0phbDoIwPshRUXz4tU9Z64pvRud8Gxh8NpIvbTDCD aJ9mU7xqWWcriyvGeFIaLNPJd3CnsApwf9yKYcNeTZd5OR4w7F/gWsrDeuQAGyL+JK7q 8LMa6i07pEejYXHmlxLR0uvcf2jyMkzsRXcDlp02dyMoT3MSwWTJGnk/tMQGsz9opxBn VyNBB/TzxSaPUSE1TpIWUxvxOZlNf1fNPDPDNVilps4ikwTZ5cOXnXU2yqDEyQUY0mL5 TfYUWiR7VCYNO4B6zDgIYQl780hoGLQ4HeF1KPujmPPb9bFpdgk0du9lAidYfp3L/uiZ B6Ag== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@foss.st.com header.s=selector1 header.b=tRhFLCWa; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=foss.st.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y17-20020a1709064b1100b0098cf69d9447si2247893eju.820.2023.07.07.08.02.51; Fri, 07 Jul 2023 08:03:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@foss.st.com header.s=selector1 header.b=tRhFLCWa; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=foss.st.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233244AbjGGPB7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 7 Jul 2023 11:01:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43752 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233237AbjGGPB6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jul 2023 11:01:58 -0400 Received: from mx07-00178001.pphosted.com (mx08-00178001.pphosted.com [91.207.212.93]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3EEA2117; Fri, 7 Jul 2023 08:01:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0046660.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 367CJqcS025684; Fri, 7 Jul 2023 17:01:11 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foss.st.com; h=message-id : date : mime-version : subject : to : cc : references : from : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=selector1; bh=eB9IoGWCIUvegW/ZzAcyhVetJXSpsKaIqIGV4oOGh/c=; b=tRhFLCWadOADsMtI7CDkPvEJbl4Tcr0n8Dd/Wx6sSteCwZNpX3HprcfJAwkDkxW7mrlR W68YnsETYM/v5EHMUG7yE+lRmrfi3GuqWkG1NCO6RcNSTwlrm2qsQgBad33QTYOMKt/j 4LIJo1eclX8j6hsrk/00LbKEKlwxezamQK+933uDE/uNMegvqq+z98UMr+aUiQybkfRi m+ZJcRCYrDINREqlQ/+l+55fRxl+Bn+QWH65DbYzWPyjf4dQHlePuh+WT/jkPypNn2Gg AOemBmnLc9Blts1e5l8ve0zCZuChDSmAHX06A/w6ifnzXW/HP4YKQHckQYQC+a/m5q37 nA== Received: from beta.dmz-eu.st.com (beta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.1.35]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3rpjm7s44u-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 07 Jul 2023 17:01:10 +0200 Received: from euls16034.sgp.st.com (euls16034.sgp.st.com [10.75.44.20]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 8627F100052; Fri, 7 Jul 2023 17:01:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Webmail-eu.st.com (shfdag1node1.st.com [10.75.129.69]) by euls16034.sgp.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 2C9272291CE; Fri, 7 Jul 2023 17:01:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.201.21.121] (10.201.21.121) by SHFDAG1NODE1.st.com (10.75.129.69) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.21; Fri, 7 Jul 2023 17:01:07 +0200 Message-ID: <66e74bba-ff7b-e3c1-9351-15bd23038e0d@foss.st.com> Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 17:01:06 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] firewall: introduce stm32_firewall framework Content-Language: en-US To: Oleksii Moisieiev CC: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , "herbert@gondor.apana.org.au" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org" , "conor+dt@kernel.org" , "alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com" , "vkoul@kernel.org" , "jic23@kernel.org" , "olivier.moysan@foss.st.com" , "arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com" , "mchehab@kernel.org" , "fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com" , "andi.shyti@kernel.org" , "ulf.hansson@linaro.org" , "edumazet@google.com" , "kuba@kernel.org" , "pabeni@redhat.com" , "hugues.fruchet@foss.st.com" , "lee@kernel.org" , "will@kernel.org" , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , "arnd@kernel.org" , "richardcochran@gmail.com" , "linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "dmaengine@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , "linux-media@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-phy@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-spi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" References: <20230705172759.1610753-1-gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com> <20230705172759.1610753-6-gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com> <87a5w7zv8o.fsf@epam.com> From: Gatien CHEVALLIER In-Reply-To: <87a5w7zv8o.fsf@epam.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.201.21.121] X-ClientProxiedBy: SHFCAS1NODE1.st.com (10.75.129.72) To SHFDAG1NODE1.st.com (10.75.129.69) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.957,Hydra:6.0.591,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2023-07-07_10,2023-07-06_02,2023-05-22_02 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Hello Oleksii, On 7/7/23 15:50, Oleksii Moisieiev wrote: > > Gatien Chevallier writes: > >> Introduce a firewall framework that offers to firewall consumers different >> firewall services such as the ability to check their access rights against >> their firewall controller(s). >> >> The firewall framework offers a generic API that is defined in firewall >> controllers drivers to best fit the specificity of each firewall. >> >> There are various types of firewalls: >> -Peripheral firewalls that filter accesses to peripherals >> -Memory firewalls that filter accesses to memories or memory regions >> -Resource firewalls that filter accesses to internal resources such as >> reset and clock controllers >> >> A firewall controller must be probed at arch_initcall level and register >> to the framework so that consumers can use their services. >> >> Signed-off-by: Gatien Chevallier >> --- >> MAINTAINERS | 5 + >> arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 1 + >> drivers/bus/Kconfig | 10 + >> drivers/bus/Makefile | 1 + >> drivers/bus/stm32_firewall.c | 252 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> drivers/bus/stm32_firewall.h | 83 +++++++ >> include/linux/bus/stm32_firewall_device.h | 134 ++++++++++++ >> 7 files changed, 486 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 drivers/bus/stm32_firewall.c >> create mode 100644 drivers/bus/stm32_firewall.h >> create mode 100644 include/linux/bus/stm32_firewall_device.h >> >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >> index 41385f01fa98..fabf95ba9b86 100644 >> --- a/MAINTAINERS >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >> @@ -20123,6 +20123,11 @@ T: git git://linuxtv.org/media_tree.git >> F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/st,st-mipid02.yaml >> F: drivers/media/i2c/st-mipid02.c >> >> +ST STM32 FIREWALL >> +M: Gatien Chevallier >> +S: Maintained >> +F: drivers/bus/stm32_firewall.c >> + >> ST STM32 I2C/SMBUS DRIVER >> M: Pierre-Yves MORDRET >> M: Alain Volmat >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms >> index 6069120199bb..5a46e90f1e4e 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms >> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms >> @@ -293,6 +293,7 @@ config ARCH_STM32 >> select ARM_SMC_MBOX >> select ARM_SCMI_PROTOCOL >> select COMMON_CLK_SCMI >> + select STM32_FIREWALL >> help >> This enables support for ARMv8 based STMicroelectronics >> STM32 family, including: >> diff --git a/drivers/bus/Kconfig b/drivers/bus/Kconfig >> index fcfa280df98a..4d54a7ea52b2 100644 >> --- a/drivers/bus/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/bus/Kconfig >> @@ -163,6 +163,16 @@ config QCOM_SSC_BLOCK_BUS >> i2c/spi/uart controllers, a hexagon core, and a clock controller >> which provides clocks for the above. >> >> +config STM32_FIREWALL >> + bool "STM32 Firewall framework" >> + depends on ARCH_STM32 >> + default MACH_STM32MP157 || MACH_STM32MP13 || MACH_STM32MP25 >> + help >> + Say y to enable firewall framework and its services. Firewall >> + controllers will be able to register to the framework. Firewall >> + controllers must be initialized and register to the firewall framework >> + at arch_initcall level. >> + >> config SUN50I_DE2_BUS >> bool "Allwinner A64 DE2 Bus Driver" >> default ARM64 >> diff --git a/drivers/bus/Makefile b/drivers/bus/Makefile >> index d90eed189a65..fc0511450ec2 100644 >> --- a/drivers/bus/Makefile >> +++ b/drivers/bus/Makefile >> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_OMAP_INTERCONNECT) += omap_l3_smx.o omap_l3_noc.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_OMAP_OCP2SCP) += omap-ocp2scp.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_EBI2) += qcom-ebi2.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_SSC_BLOCK_BUS) += qcom-ssc-block-bus.o >> +obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_FIREWALL) += stm32_firewall.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_SUN50I_DE2_BUS) += sun50i-de2.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_SUNXI_RSB) += sunxi-rsb.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_OF) += simple-pm-bus.o >> diff --git a/drivers/bus/stm32_firewall.c b/drivers/bus/stm32_firewall.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..510db5bc6eaf >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/drivers/bus/stm32_firewall.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,252 @@ >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later >> +/* >> + * Copyright (C) 2023, STMicroelectronics - All Rights Reserved >> + */ >> + >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> + >> +#include "stm32_firewall.h" >> + >> +/* Corresponds to STM32_FIREWALL_MAX_EXTRA_ARGS + firewall controller reference + firewall ID */ >> +#define STM32_FIREWALL_MAX_ARGS (STM32_FIREWALL_MAX_EXTRA_ARGS + 2) >> + >> +static LIST_HEAD(firewall_controller_list); >> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(firewall_controller_list_lock); >> + >> +static int stm32_firewall_get_id(struct device_node *np, u32 *id) >> +{ >> + u32 feature_domain_cell[2]; >> + >> + /* Get property from device node */ >> + if (of_property_read_u32_array(np, "feature-domains", >> + feature_domain_cell, >> + ARRAY_SIZE(feature_domain_cell))) { >> + pr_err("Unable to find get firewall ID property\n"); >> + return -ENODEV; >> + } >> + >> + *id = feature_domain_cell[1]; >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +/* Firewall device API */ >> + >> +int stm32_firewall_get_firewall(struct device_node *np, >> + struct stm32_firewall *firewall) >> +{ >> + struct stm32_firewall_controller *ctrl; >> + struct of_phandle_args args; >> + u32 controller_phandle; >> + bool match = false; >> + size_t i; >> + int err; >> + >> + if (!firewall) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + /* The controller phandle is always the first argument of the feature-domains property. */ >> + err = of_property_read_u32(np, "feature-domains", &controller_phandle); >> + if (err) { >> + pr_err("Unable to get feature-domains property for node %s\n", np->full_name); >> + return err; >> + } >> + >> + /* Parse property with phandle parsed out */ >> + err = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "feature-domains", "#feature-domain-cells", 0, &args); >> + if (err) { >> + pr_err("Unable to read feature-domains arguments for node %s\n", np->full_name); >> + return err; >> + } >> + >> + /* The phandle is parsed out */ >> + if (args.args_count > STM32_FIREWALL_MAX_ARGS - 1) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + of_node_put(np); >> + >> + /* Check if the parsed phandle corresponds to a registered firewall controller */ >> + mutex_lock(&firewall_controller_list_lock); >> + list_for_each_entry(ctrl, &firewall_controller_list, entry) { >> + if (ctrl->dev->of_node->phandle == controller_phandle) { >> + match = true; >> + firewall->firewall_ctrl = ctrl; >> + break; >> + } >> + } >> + mutex_unlock(&firewall_controller_list_lock); >> + if (!match) { >> + firewall->firewall_ctrl = NULL; >> + pr_err("No firewall controller registered for %s\n", np->full_name); >> + return -ENODEV; >> + } >> + >> + /* >> + * The firewall ID is always the second argument of the feature-domains property. >> + * The first argument is already parsed out, so args.args[0] is the second argument. >> + */ >> + firewall->firewall_id = args.args[0]; >> + >> + /* Extra args start at the third argument */ >> + for (i = 0; i < args.args_count; i++) >> + firewall->extra_args[i] = args.args[i + 1]; >> + >> + /* Remove the firewall ID arg that is not an extra argument */ >> + if (args.args_count >= 1) >> + firewall->extra_args_size = args.args_count - 1; > > As I can see you support some extra args, that can be provided in the > feature-domain property. But in the binding description I see maxItems: > 2. I beliewe this should be highlighted in bindings description. > Good point, maybe it would be better to define a high maxItem value in the binding description that is aligned with STM32_FIREWALL_MAX_ARGS. >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stm32_firewall_get_firewall); >> + >> +int stm32_firewall_grant_access(struct stm32_firewall *firewall) >> +{ >> + struct stm32_firewall_controller *firewall_controller; >> + >> + if (!firewall || firewall->firewall_id == U32_MAX) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + firewall_controller = firewall->firewall_ctrl; >> + >> + if (!firewall_controller) >> + return -ENODEV; >> + >> + return firewall_controller->grant_access(firewall_controller, firewall->firewall_id); >> +} >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stm32_firewall_grant_access); >> + >> +int stm32_firewall_grant_access_by_id(struct stm32_firewall *firewall, u32 subsystem_id) >> +{ >> + struct stm32_firewall_controller *firewall_controller; >> + >> + if (!firewall || subsystem_id == U32_MAX || firewall->firewall_id == U32_MAX) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + firewall_controller = firewall->firewall_ctrl; >> + >> + if (!firewall_controller) >> + return -ENODEV; >> + >> + return firewall_controller->grant_access(firewall_controller, subsystem_id); >> +} >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stm32_firewall_grant_access_by_id); >> + >> +void stm32_firewall_release_access(struct stm32_firewall *firewall) >> +{ >> + struct stm32_firewall_controller *firewall_controller; >> + >> + if (!firewall || firewall->firewall_id == U32_MAX) { >> + pr_err("Incorrect arguments when releasing a firewall access"); >> + return; >> + } >> + >> + firewall_controller = firewall->firewall_ctrl; >> + >> + if (!firewall_controller) { >> + pr_debug("No firewall controller to release"); >> + return; >> + } >> + >> + firewall_controller->release_access(firewall_controller, firewall->firewall_id); >> +} >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stm32_firewall_release_access); >> + >> +void stm32_firewall_release_access_by_id(struct stm32_firewall *firewall, u32 subsystem_id) >> +{ >> + struct stm32_firewall_controller *firewall_controller; >> + >> + if (!firewall || subsystem_id == U32_MAX || firewall->firewall_id == U32_MAX) { >> + pr_err("Incorrect arguments when releasing a firewall access"); >> + return; >> + } >> + >> + firewall_controller = firewall->firewall_ctrl; >> + >> + if (!firewall_controller) { >> + pr_debug("No firewall controller to release"); >> + return; >> + } >> + >> + firewall_controller->release_access(firewall_controller, subsystem_id); >> +} >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stm32_firewall_release_access_by_id); >> + >> +/* Firewall controller API */ >> + >> +int stm32_firewall_controller_register(struct stm32_firewall_controller *firewall_controller) >> +{ >> + pr_info("Registering firewall controller %s", dev_name(firewall_controller->dev)); >> + >> + if (!firewall_controller) >> + return -ENODEV; >> + >> + mutex_lock(&firewall_controller_list_lock); >> + list_add_tail(&firewall_controller->entry, &firewall_controller_list); >> + mutex_unlock(&firewall_controller_list_lock); >> + >> + return 0; >> + >> +} >> + >> +void stm32_firewall_controller_unregister(struct stm32_firewall_controller *firewall_controller) >> +{ >> + struct stm32_firewall_controller *ctrl, *tmp; >> + bool controller_removed = false; >> + >> + if (!firewall_controller) { >> + pr_debug("Null reference while unregistering firewall controller"); >> + return; >> + } >> + >> + mutex_lock(&firewall_controller_list_lock); >> + list_for_each_entry_safe(ctrl, tmp, &firewall_controller_list, entry) { >> + if (ctrl == firewall_controller) { >> + controller_removed = true; >> + list_del_init(&ctrl->entry); >> + break; >> + } >> + } > IIUC list_for_each_entry_safe protects you from removing node during > loop. But all list operations are done under > firewall_controller_list_lock mutex. I beliewe there is no need for > _safe call under the mutex because removing node during loop is > impossible. I think it worth investigation if it's safe to use > list_for_each_entry_safe without lock. AFAICT, list_for_each_entry_safe() does not protect against concurrent accesses, so I'll keep the mutex lock. Deleting while iterating will cause trouble if not using the safe version. I think it is fine as it is. >> + mutex_unlock(&firewall_controller_list_lock); >> + >> + if (!controller_removed) >> + pr_debug("There was no firewall controller named %s to unregister", >> + dev_name(firewall_controller->dev)); >> +} >> + >> +void stm32_firewall_populate_bus(struct stm32_firewall_controller *firewall_controller) >> +{ >> + struct device_node *child; >> + struct device *parent; >> + u32 firewall_id; >> + int err; >> + >> + parent = firewall_controller->dev; >> + >> + dev_dbg(parent, "Populating %s system bus\n", dev_name(firewall_controller->dev)); >> + >> + for_each_available_child_of_node(dev_of_node(parent), child) { >> + err = stm32_firewall_get_id(child, &firewall_id); >> + if (err < 0 || >> + firewall_controller->grant_access(firewall_controller, firewall_id)) { >> + /* >> + * Peripheral access not allowed or not defined. >> + * Mark the node as populated so platform bus won't probe it >> + */ >> + of_node_set_flag(child, OF_POPULATED); >> + dev_err(parent, "%s: Device driver will not be probed\n", >> + child->full_name); >> + } >> + } >> +} >> diff --git a/drivers/bus/stm32_firewall.h b/drivers/bus/stm32_firewall.h >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..8d92e8c1ab77 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/drivers/bus/stm32_firewall.h >> @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ >> +/* >> + * Copyright (C) 2023, STMicroelectronics - All Rights Reserved >> + */ >> + >> +#ifndef _STM32_FIREWALL_H >> +#define _STM32_FIREWALL_H >> + >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> + >> +/** >> + * STM32_PERIPHERAL_FIREWALL: This type of firewall protects peripherals > > Intendation > >> + * STM32_MEMORY_FIREWALL: This type of firewall protects memories/subsets of memory >> + * zones >> + * STM32_RESOURCE_FIREWALL: This type of firewall protects internal resources >> + * STM32_NOTYPE_FIREWALL: Undefined firewall type >> + */ >> + >> +#define STM32_PERIPHERAL_FIREWALL BIT(1) > > Intendation > I'm sorry but I don't understand. I indent with tabs, maybe this is why it appears strange here. The indentation is fine, same for others below. >> +#define STM32_MEMORY_FIREWALL BIT(2) >> +#define STM32_RESOURCE_FIREWALL BIT(3) >> +#define STM32_NOTYPE_FIREWALL BIT(4) >> + >> +/** >> + * struct stm32_firewall_controller - Information on firewall controller supplying services >> + * >> + * @name Name of the firewall controller >> + * @dev Device reference of the firewall controller > > Intendation > >> + * @mmio Base address of the firewall controller >> + * @entry List entry of the firewall controller list >> + * @type Type of firewall >> + * @max_entries Number of entries covered by the firewall > Intendation > >> + * @grant_access Callback used to grant access for a device access against a >> + * firewall controller >> + * @release_access Callback used to release resources taken by a device when access was >> + * granted >> + * @grant_memory_range_access Callback used to grant access for a device to a given memory region >> + */ >> +struct stm32_firewall_controller { >> + const char *name; >> + struct device *dev; >> + void __iomem *mmio; >> + struct list_head entry; >> + unsigned int type; >> + unsigned int max_entries; >> + >> + int (*grant_access)(struct stm32_firewall_controller *ctrl, u32 id); >> + void (*release_access)(struct stm32_firewall_controller *ctrl, u32 id); >> + int (*grant_memory_range_access)(struct stm32_firewall_controller *ctrl, phys_addr_t paddr, >> + size_t size); >> +}; >> + >> +/** >> + * int stm32_firewall_controller_register - Register a firewall controller to the STM32 firewall >> + * framework >> + * @firewall_controller Firewall controller to register >> + * >> + * Returns 0 in case of success or -ENODEV if no controller was given. >> + */ >> +int stm32_firewall_controller_register(struct stm32_firewall_controller *firewall_controller); >> + >> +/** >> + * int stm32_firewall_controller_unregister - Unregister a firewall controller from the STM32 >> + * firewall framework >> + * @firewall_controller Firewall controller to unregister >> + */ >> +void stm32_firewall_controller_unregister(struct stm32_firewall_controller *firewall_controller); >> + >> +/** >> + * stm32_firewall_populate_bus - Populate device tree nodes that have a correct firewall >> + * configuration. This is used at boot-time only, as a sanity check >> + * between device tree and firewalls hardware configurations to >> + * prevent a kernel crash when a device driver is not granted access >> + * >> + * @firewall_controller Firewall controller which nodes will be populated or not >> + */ >> +void stm32_firewall_populate_bus(struct stm32_firewall_controller *firewall_controller); >> + >> +#endif /* _STM32_FIREWALL_H */ >> diff --git a/include/linux/bus/stm32_firewall_device.h b/include/linux/bus/stm32_firewall_device.h >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..ccaecea7fc6c >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/include/linux/bus/stm32_firewall_device.h >> @@ -0,0 +1,134 @@ >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ >> +/* >> + * Copyright (C) 2023, STMicroelectronics - All Rights Reserved >> + */ >> + >> +#ifndef STM32_FIREWALL_DEVICE_H >> +#define STM32_FIREWALL_DEVICE_H >> + >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> + >> +#define STM32_FIREWALL_MAX_EXTRA_ARGS 5 > > It's not clear to me why it's 5. Comment above sais this is > implementation defined. Maybe this parameter can be configurable? > Maybe it should be part of compat_data of firewall controllers :) >> + >> +/* Opaque reference to stm32_firewall_controller */ >> +struct stm32_firewall_controller; >> + >> +/** >> + * stm32_firewall - Information on a device's firewall. Each device can have more than one firewall. >> + * >> + * @firewall_ctrl Pointer referencing a firewall controller of the device. It is >> + * opaque so a device cannot manipulate the controller's ops or access >> + * the controller's data >> + * @extra_args Extra arguments that are implementation dependent >> + * @extra_args_size Number of extra arguments >> + * @firewall_id Firewall ID associated the device for this firewall controller >> + */ >> +struct stm32_firewall { >> + struct stm32_firewall_controller *firewall_ctrl; >> + u32 extra_args[STM32_FIREWALL_MAX_EXTRA_ARGS]; >> + size_t extra_args_size; >> + u32 firewall_id; >> +}; >> + >> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STM32_FIREWALL) >> +/** >> + * stm32_firewall_get_firewall - Get the firewall(s) associated to given device. >> + * The firewall controller reference is always the first argument >> + * of the feature-domains property. >> + * The firewall ID is always the second argument of the >> + * feature-domains property. >> + * >> + * @np Device node to parse > > Intendation > >> + * @firewall Resulting firewall reference(s) >> + * >> + * Returns 0 on success, -ENODEV if there's no match with a firewall controller or appropriate errno >> + * code if error occurred. >> + */ >> +int stm32_firewall_get_firewall(struct device_node *np, struct stm32_firewall *firewall); >> + >> +/** >> + * stm32_firewall_grant_access - Request firewall access rights and grant access. >> + * >> + * @firewall Firewall reference containing the ID to check against its firewall >> + * controller >> + * >> + * Returns 0 if access is granted, -EACCES if access is denied, -ENODEV if firewall is null or >> + * appropriate errno code if error occurred >> + */ >> +int stm32_firewall_grant_access(struct stm32_firewall *firewall); >> + >> +/** >> + * stm32_firewall_release_access - Release access granted from a call to >> + * stm32_firewall_grant_access(). >> + * >> + * @firewall Firewall reference containing the ID to check against its firewall >> + * controller >> + */ >> +void stm32_firewall_release_access(struct stm32_firewall *firewall); >> + >> +/** >> + * stm32_firewall_grant_access_by_id - Request firewall access rights of a given device >> + * based on a specific firewall ID >> + * >> + * Warnings: >> + * There is no way to ensure that the given ID will correspond to the firewall referenced in the >> + * device node if the ID did not come from stm32_firewall_get_firewall(). In that case, this >> + * function must be used with caution. >> + * This function should be used for subsystem resources that do not have the same firewall ID >> + * as their parent. >> + * U32_MAX is an invalid ID. >> + * >> + * @firewall Firewall reference containing the firewall controller >> + * @subsystem_id Firewall ID of the subsystem resource >> + * >> + * Returns 0 if access is granted, -EACCES if access is denied, -ENODEV if firewall is null or >> + * appropriate errno code if error occurred >> + */ >> +int stm32_firewall_grant_access_by_id(struct stm32_firewall *firewall, u32 subsystem_id); > > Can we store all registered IDs that were found by populate_bus > functio, or is it expected when this function was called before > populate_bus call? > This function is intended to be used by devices that needs to check specific ID. Maybe IDs of peripherals that do not have a driver in Linux / driver isn't probed / ... About storing all IDs found when populating the bus, do you have some use in mind? :) Else I'd prefer to save some memory. Best regards, Gatien >> + >> +/** >> + * stm32_firewall_release_access_by_id - Release access granted from a call to >> + * stm32_firewall_grant_access_by_id(). >> + * >> + * Warnings: >> + * There is no way to ensure that the given ID will correspond to the firewall referenced in the >> + * device node if the ID did not come from stm32_firewall_get_firewall(). In that case, this >> + * function must be used with caution. >> + * This function should be used for subsystem resources that do not have the same firewall ID >> + * as their parent. >> + * U32_MAX is an invalid ID. >> + * >> + * @firewall Firewall reference containing the firewall controller >> + * @subsystem_id Firewall ID of the subsystem resource >> + */ >> +void stm32_firewall_release_access_by_id(struct stm32_firewall *firewall, u32 subsystem_id); >> + >> +#else /* CONFIG_STM32_FIREWALL */ >> + >> +int stm32_firewall_get_firewall(struct device_node *np, struct stm32_firewall *firewall) >> +{ >> + return -ENODEV; >> +} >> + >> +int stm32_firewall_grant_access(struct stm32_firewall *firewall) >> +{ >> + return -ENODEV; >> +} >> + >> +void stm32_firewall_release_access(struct stm32_firewall *firewall) >> +{ >> +} >> + >> +int stm32_firewall_grant_access_by_id(struct stm32_firewall *firewall, u32 subsystem_id) >> +{ >> + return -ENODEV; >> +} >> + >> +void stm32_firewall_release_access_by_id(struct stm32_firewall *firewall, u32 subsystem_id) >> +{ >> +} >> + >> +#endif /* CONFIG_STM32_FIREWALL */ >> +#endif /* STM32_FIREWALL_DEVICE_H */ > >