Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 13 Jul 2023 23:27:08 -0700
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To:     Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc:     palmer@dabbelt.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com,
        aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
        davem@davemloft.net, conor.dooley@microchip.com,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, christoph.muellner@vrull.eu,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] RISC-V: support some cryptography accelerations
Message-ID: <20230714062708.GH913@sol.localdomain>
References: <20230711153743.1970625-1-heiko@sntech.de>
 <20230713074042.GF2199@sol.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230713074042.GF2199@sol.localdomain>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 12:40:42AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 05:37:31PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
> > 
> > This series provides cryptographic implementations using the vector
> > crypto extensions.
> > 
> > v13 of the vector patchset dropped the patches for in-kernel usage of
> > vector instructions, I picked the ones from v12 over into this series
> > for now.
> > 
> > My basic goal was to not re-invent cryptographic code, so the heavy
> > lifting is done by those perl-asm scripts used in openssl and the perl
> > code used here-in stems from code that is targetted at openssl [0] and is
> > unmodified from there to limit needed review effort.
> > 
> > With a matching qemu (there are patches for vector-crypto flying around)
> > the in-kernel crypto-selftests (also the extended ones) are very happy
> > so far.
> 
> Where does this patchset apply to?  I tried torvalds/master, linux-next/master,
> riscv/for-next, and cryptodev/master.  Nothing worked.  When sending a
> patch(set), please always use the '--base' option to 'git format-patch', or
> explicitly mention where it applies to, or provide a link to a git repo.
> 

Hi Heiko, any update on this?  I would like to review, and maybe test, this
patchset but there's no way for me to do so.

- Eric