Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley
        Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United
        Kingdom.
        Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
From:   David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <31ddce1d-6014-bf9f-95da-97deb3240606@leemhuis.info>
References: <31ddce1d-6014-bf9f-95da-97deb3240606@leemhuis.info> <CAAUqJDuRkHE8fPgZJGaKjUjd3QfGwzfumuJBmStPqBhubxyk_A@mail.gmail.com>
To:     Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>
Cc:     dhowells@redhat.com, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        =?UTF-8?B?T25kcmVqIE1vc27DocSNZWs=?= <omosnacek@gmail.com>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Another regression in the af_alg series (s390x-specific)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <20078.1690368182.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 26 Jul 2023 11:43:02 +0100
Message-ID: <20079.1690368182@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk

"Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" wrote:

> What's the status wrt to this regression (caused by c1abe6f570af from
> David)? It looks like there never was a real reply and the regression
> still is unresolved. But maybe I missed something, which can easily
> happen in my position.

I was on holiday when the regression was posted.  This week I've been working
through various things raised during the last couple of weeks whilst fighting
an intermittent apparent bug on my desktop kernel somewhere in ext4, the mm
subsys, md or dm-crypt.

I'll get round to it, but I'll I don't have s390x h/w immediately to hand.

David