Received: by 2002:a05:7412:6592:b0:d7:7d3a:4fe2 with SMTP id m18csp778690rdg; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 21:54:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEJbKtv53x0UpBWZxvFFppi+YkrBJ9KSt6iem8GaQ8zHllPjk04SS1TuZ4dyh/0Pdy7mnYW X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8885:0:b0:66a:2771:6c4d with SMTP id z5-20020aa78885000000b0066a27716c4dmr935822pfe.4.1691729649932; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 21:54:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1691729649; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GOZAYSzCjtGHcmesWW/90f5NMg7mxOS0E6Tu9vLB3FdJnSio0m8rLyPG/SkC5UXTrT HGE552Jd4oSqxAF8JOj8G/Yo9AX4EtlqV7S/c34E0FwOG1YQ0jVOtxu4XAd3w4CmnMJn Bgg9FL1uYKKpKRPIhKPcxrgRMHUTpDavwhaD54xvvSnBMvZFslKEFFSXj9d9yE+L/lKc Il8fqJcx3j7V611AgUzeq6mUA3yb3k4qrwv0ACko5RRXDD7a6suDWPKw5sh4mSlQdc2M r7dC1zBMhhDwyv3JJcpehYt/TIBXVgiJabg6nOGqa6gRboFiiZXklhOaEWRNhifFCx+S 6vDg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=9RLNVVDKvzV96niWZMcD3NvKvth2FHUULLpGuZdok0w=; fh=PQdHqATfrG4DAjwJSixreUbFTX4DVYWDqKOw/IULK+Y=; b=YUFQI0mraIFCMTidr1lkh/kMrcDvDqRKiZSGorFpAqMqMHA7ECuRVsfYXFxebAoEfw 5F+kmFxohrFFJMmP4WwN0gWR/rsIbQLt11+A7bArzDjkbZRqFAxxooNbAj0vBIp8npbG U4WkgeTLqO/uMuGWPiHyEUagiVAkr0kpmpXlE6LQ8nDz5/R1GQPjFQLlFMu6P8O3Mrjo tYqs1Q2nCKUckxD2K9Svo8B4IVvEB068veXtuNO5+mwJJPoPH3yFiRjiUyTg6qMub4K/ /zwcdytmvTp/bF22i8PKl8BbFE+8FND4EHzLZtj5v0ef2i//L6cDI/GOtczehmwDOwJL H8Sw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f10-20020a056a0022ca00b00687978513d0si2821503pfj.352.2023.08.10.21.53.56; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 21:54:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229543AbjHKEk7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 11 Aug 2023 00:40:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44822 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229499AbjHKEk6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Aug 2023 00:40:58 -0400 Received: from 167-179-156-38.a7b39c.syd.nbn.aussiebb.net (167-179-156-38.a7b39c.syd.nbn.aussiebb.net [167.179.156.38]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 748F8270F for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 21:40:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from loth.rohan.me.apana.org.au ([192.168.167.2]) by formenos.hmeau.com with smtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Debian)) id 1qUJx1-001wBr-8G; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 12:40:40 +0800 Received: by loth.rohan.me.apana.org.au (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 11 Aug 2023 12:40:39 +0800 Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 12:40:39 +0800 From: Herbert Xu To: "Guozihua (Scott)" Cc: davem@davemloft.net, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 3/3] crypto: Introduce SM9 key exchange algorithm Message-ID: References: <20230625014958.32631-1-guozihua@huawei.com> <20230625014958.32631-4-guozihua@huawei.com> <1bcf580b-3a19-c0aa-b3cb-1f9f183b61e4@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1bcf580b-3a19-c0aa-b3cb-1f9f183b61e4@huawei.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2, PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,TVD_RCVD_IP,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 11:25:27AM +0800, Guozihua (Scott) wrote: > > Just while we are here, do you think it's a good idea to also introduce > a new crypto algorithm type for IBCs to better support their > functionality if there are usage within kernel and we are to port this > algorithm in? If there is a general need for a new type then it will be considered. I cannot answer your question as I have no idea what you have in mind and how generally applicable it is. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt