Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto+bounces-2163-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Precedence: bulk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 11:35:00 +0100
Message-Id: <CZ8ZLKN072K5.1WRT68QL5IUSZ@fairphone.com>
From: "Luca Weiss" <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>
To: "Bjorn Andersson" <andersson@kernel.org>
Cc: "Stephan Gerhold" <stephan@gerhold.net>, "Andy Gross"
 <agross@kernel.org>, "Konrad Dybcio" <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>, "Thara
 Gopinath" <thara.gopinath@gmail.com>, "Herbert Xu"
 <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
 "Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>, "Krzysztof Kozlowski"
 <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, "Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
 "Bhupesh Sharma" <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>,
 <~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht>, <phone-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
 <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
 <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: Add Crypto Engine
References: <20240105-sm6350-qce-v1-0-416e5c7319ac@fairphone.com>
 <20240105-sm6350-qce-v1-2-416e5c7319ac@fairphone.com>
 <ZZguvdJTyVgfxm4D@gerhold.net> <CZ6FYZLGWT3K.ZBHYDQ7TDN4B@fairphone.com>
 <pbjbhnj4opt57xswk7jfg2h2wjdv3onmg4ukxn22tsjjsnknxv@m5gy44kkbvvl>
In-Reply-To: <pbjbhnj4opt57xswk7jfg2h2wjdv3onmg4ukxn22tsjjsnknxv@m5gy44kkbvvl>

On Fri Feb 16, 2024 at 7:09 PM CET, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 11:46:49AM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > On Fri Jan 5, 2024 at 5:30 PM CET, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 05:15:44PM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > > > Add crypto engine (CE) and CE BAM related nodes and definitions for=
 this
> > > > SoC.
> > > >=20
> > > > For reference:
> > > >=20
> > > >   [    2.297419] qcrypto 1dfa000.crypto: Crypto device found, versi=
on 5.5.1
> > > >=20
> > > > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6350.dtsi | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++=
+++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
> > > >=20
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6350.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot=
/dts/qcom/sm6350.dtsi
> > > > index 8fd6f4d03490..516aadbb16bb 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6350.dtsi
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6350.dtsi
> > > > @@ -1212,6 +1212,37 @@ ufs_mem_phy_lanes: phy@1d87400 {
> > > >  			};
> > > >  		};
> > > > =20
> > > > +		cryptobam: dma-controller@1dc4000 {
> > > > +			compatible =3D "qcom,bam-v1.7.4", "qcom,bam-v1.7.0";
> > > > +			reg =3D <0 0x01dc4000 0 0x24000>;
> > > > +			interrupts =3D <GIC_SPI 272 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > > > +			#dma-cells =3D <1>;
> > > > +			qcom,ee =3D <0>;
> > > > +			qcom,controlled-remotely;
> > > > +			num-channels =3D <16>;
> > > > +			qcom,num-ees =3D <4>;
> > > > +			iommus =3D <&apps_smmu 0x432 0x0000>,
> > > > +				 <&apps_smmu 0x438 0x0001>,
> > > > +				 <&apps_smmu 0x43f 0x0000>,
> > > > +				 <&apps_smmu 0x426 0x0011>,
> > > > +				 <&apps_smmu 0x436 0x0011>;
> > >
> > > The last two lines look equivalent to me: 0x436 & ~0x0011 =3D 0x426.
> >=20
> > I don't understand the IOMMU SID + mask really, but I think I've seen
> > somewhere before like here that TZ can be a bit picky with the SIDs?
> >=20
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/opqdrmyj3y64nqqqmakjydn5rkspizufy=
eavm7ec7c7ufqz4wk@ey2a7bq3shfj/
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/11b5db69-49f5-4d7b-81c9-687d66a5c=
b0d@linaro.org/
> >=20
> > I don't quite want to risk having some obscure use case breaking becaus=
e
> > we cleaned up the dts ;)
> >=20
> > But if you're more sure than me that it won't break, let me know!
> >=20
> > >
> > > It's also a bit weird that the mask has one more digit than the strea=
m
> > > ID. And ordered numerically (by stream ID, first number) it would be =
a
> > > bit easier to read. :-)
> >=20
> > Sorting them is no problem, can do that for v2.
> >=20
>
> Where you able to do this? I don't see a v2 in my inbox, am I just
> searching poorly?

Only sent v2 some minutes ago, didn't have any more time on Friday.

Regards
Luca

>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Stephan
> >=20