2012-08-20 05:10:00

by David Miller

Subject: [PATCH 0/4] Crytpo hash drivers for sparc64 crypto instructions.

SPARC-T4 and later support cryptographic instructions.

This patch series adds support for the hash digest algorithms.

This includes md5, sha1, sha224, sha256, sha384, and sha512.

Herbert, this depends upon sparc64 cpu feature detection
infrastructure that is going in via the sparc-next tree, so I intend
to commit this work there if you don't mind.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

2012-08-20 08:22:04

by Herbert Xu

Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Crytpo hash drivers for sparc64 crypto instructions.

On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:10:00PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> SPARC-T4 and later support cryptographic instructions.
>
> This patch series adds support for the hash digest algorithms.
>
> This includes md5, sha1, sha224, sha256, sha384, and sha512.
>
> Herbert, this depends upon sparc64 cpu feature detection
> infrastructure that is going in via the sparc-next tree, so I intend
> to commit this work there if you don't mind.
>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>

Thanks! Looks good to me.
--
Email: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

2012-08-20 22:07:54

by David Miller

Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Crytpo hash drivers for sparc64 crypto instructions.

From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:22:02 +0800

> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:10:00PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>>
>> SPARC-T4 and later support cryptographic instructions.
>>
>> This patch series adds support for the hash digest algorithms.
>>
>> This includes md5, sha1, sha224, sha256, sha384, and sha512.
>>
>> Herbert, this depends upon sparc64 cpu feature detection
>> infrastructure that is going in via the sparc-next tree, so I intend
>> to commit this work there if you don't mind.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
>
> Acked-by: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
>
> Thanks! Looks good to me.

Thanks for reviewing.