2009-06-02 12:13:01

by Peng Tao

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH-e2fsprogs] filefrag: accept positive ioctl return value

Some ioctl() returns non-negative value on success. filefrag_fiemap should
treat positive ioctl() return values as success.
This can be triggered by running filefrag on btrfs partitions.

Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <[email protected]>
---
misc/filefrag.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/misc/filefrag.c b/misc/filefrag.c
index 80ac05c..3dc966a 100644
--- a/misc/filefrag.c
+++ b/misc/filefrag.c
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ int filefrag_fiemap(int fd, int blk_shift, int *num_extents)
fiemap_incompat_printed = 1;
}
}
- if (rc)
+ if (rc < 0)
return rc;

if (!verbose) {
--
1.6.2.GIT



2009-06-02 12:40:27

by Theodore Ts'o

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH-e2fsprogs] filefrag: accept positive ioctl return value

On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 08:12:41PM +0800, Peng Tao wrote:
> Some ioctl() returns non-negative value on success. filefrag_fiemap should
> treat positive ioctl() return values as success.
> This can be triggered by running filefrag on btrfs partitions.

What does the positive fiemap ioctl return mean? It's not documented
in Documentation/filesystems/fiemap.txt.

- Ted

2009-06-02 12:59:21

by Theodore Ts'o

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH-e2fsprogs] filefrag: accept positive ioctl return value

On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 08:12:41PM +0800, Peng Tao wrote:
> Some ioctl() returns non-negative value on success. filefrag_fiemap should
> treat positive ioctl() return values as success.
> This can be triggered by running filefrag on btrfs partitions.

Thanks for reporting this!

It turns out that wasn't the only bug in that code; the syscall
infrastructure will take a negative return value and maps that to -1,
and moves the (negative) error code to a positive value in errno. So
the more appropriate patch is as follows.

- Ted

commit e78968f7a42fb1fa75c356dd323d957b307b887f
Author: Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]>
Date: Tue Jun 2 08:45:22 2009 -0400

filefrag: Fix error checking for the fiemap ioctl

Thanks to Peng Tao for reporting this problem.

Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]>

diff --git a/misc/filefrag.c b/misc/filefrag.c
index 80ac05c..7095949 100644
--- a/misc/filefrag.c
+++ b/misc/filefrag.c
@@ -201,15 +201,14 @@ int filefrag_fiemap(int fd, int blk_shift, int *num_extents)
fiemap->fm_flags = flags;
fiemap->fm_extent_count = count;
rc = ioctl(fd, FS_IOC_FIEMAP, (unsigned long) fiemap);
- if (rc == -EBADR) {
- if (fiemap_incompat_printed == 0) {
+ if (rc < 0) {
+ if (errno == EBADR && fiemap_incompat_printed == 0) {
printf("FIEMAP failed with unsupported "
"flags %x\n", fiemap->fm_flags);
fiemap_incompat_printed = 1;
}
- }
- if (rc)
return rc;
+ }

if (!verbose) {
*num_extents = fiemap->fm_mapped_extents;

2009-06-02 17:10:15

by Peng Tao

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH-e2fsprogs] filefrag: accept positive ioctl return value

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Theodore Tso <[email protected]> wrote:
> What does the positive fiemap ioctl return mean?  It's not documented
> in Documentation/filesystems/fiemap.txt.
The positive btrfs_fiemap ioctl return comes from
fiemap_fill_next_extent(), which returns 1 to indicate that
user-supplied fm_extents array is full according to
Documentation/filesystems/fiemap.txt.

--
Cheers,
Bergwolf