2008-01-23 19:09:45

by Jan Kara

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] Fix commit block write in JBD

Hi,

the patch below fixes preparation of commit block in
journal_write_commit_record(). Obviously the bug doesn't really matter
since nobody reported it so far but let's cleanup the code... Andrew, could
you please queue it up? Thanks.

Honza
--
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR
---

Commit block is expected to have several copies of the header. Fix the
bug Andrew has spotted ages ago.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>

diff --git a/fs/jbd/commit.c b/fs/jbd/commit.c
index 610264b..a69b240 100644
--- a/fs/jbd/commit.c
+++ b/fs/jbd/commit.c
@@ -116,9 +116,8 @@ static int journal_write_commit_record(journal_t *journal,

bh = jh2bh(descriptor);

- /* AKPM: buglet - add `i' to tmp! */
for (i = 0; i < bh->b_size; i += 512) {
- journal_header_t *tmp = (journal_header_t*)bh->b_data;
+ journal_header_t *tmp = (journal_header_t*)(bh->b_data+i);
tmp->h_magic = cpu_to_be32(JFS_MAGIC_NUMBER);
tmp->h_blocktype = cpu_to_be32(JFS_COMMIT_BLOCK);
tmp->h_sequence = cpu_to_be32(commit_transaction->t_tid);


2008-01-23 19:10:55

by Jan Kara

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] Fix commit block write in JBD2

On Wed 23-01-08 20:09:43, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the patch below fixes preparation of commit block in
> journal_write_commit_record(). Obviously the bug doesn't really matter
> since nobody reported it so far but let's cleanup the code... Andrew, could
> you please queue it up? Thanks.
And the same fix for JBD2.

Honza
--
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR
---

Commit block is expected to have several copies of the header. Fix the
bug Andrew has spotted ages ago.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>

diff --git a/fs/jbd2/commit.c b/fs/jbd2/commit.c
index 6986f33..ed61283 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/commit.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/commit.c
@@ -116,9 +116,8 @@ static int journal_write_commit_record(journal_t *journal,

bh = jh2bh(descriptor);

- /* AKPM: buglet - add `i' to tmp! */
for (i = 0; i < bh->b_size; i += 512) {
- journal_header_t *tmp = (journal_header_t*)bh->b_data;
+ journal_header_t *tmp = (journal_header_t*)(bh->b_data+i);
tmp->h_magic = cpu_to_be32(JBD2_MAGIC_NUMBER);
tmp->h_blocktype = cpu_to_be32(JBD2_COMMIT_BLOCK);
tmp->h_sequence = cpu_to_be32(commit_transaction->t_tid);

2008-01-23 21:19:47

by Girish Shilamkar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix commit block write in JBD2

Hi,
The loop was removed in journal checksum patch. There had been a
discussion (11 Jul 2007: [EXT4 set 8][PATCH 1/1]Add journal checksums)
about this part of code as checksum info was added to commit block.

Regards,
Girish
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 20:10 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 23-01-08 20:09:43, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the patch below fixes preparation of commit block in
> > journal_write_commit_record(). Obviously the bug doesn't really matter
> > since nobody reported it so far but let's cleanup the code... Andrew, could
> > you please queue it up? Thanks.
> And the same fix for JBD2.
>
> Honza

2008-01-23 22:01:24

by Jan Kara

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix commit block write in JBD2

Hi,

On Thu 24-01-08 02:48:41, Girish Shilamkar wrote:
> The loop was removed in journal checksum patch. There had been a
> discussion (11 Jul 2007: [EXT4 set 8][PATCH 1/1]Add journal checksums)
> about this part of code as checksum info was added to commit block.
Ah, OK, thanks for explanation. So for JBD2 we don't need the patch
anymore. But for JBD it's still needed.

Honza

> On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 20:10 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Wed 23-01-08 20:09:43, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > the patch below fixes preparation of commit block in
> > > journal_write_commit_record(). Obviously the bug doesn't really matter
> > > since nobody reported it so far but let's cleanup the code... Andrew, could
> > > you please queue it up? Thanks.
> > And the same fix for JBD2.
> >
> > Honza
>
--
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR

2008-01-27 06:02:45

by Andrew Morton

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix commit block write in JBD

> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:09:43 +0100 Jan Kara <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Commit block is expected to have several copies of the header. Fix the
> bug Andrew has spotted ages ago.
>

"ages" indeed.

>
> diff --git a/fs/jbd/commit.c b/fs/jbd/commit.c
> index 610264b..a69b240 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd/commit.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd/commit.c
> @@ -116,9 +116,8 @@ static int journal_write_commit_record(journal_t *journal,
>
> bh = jh2bh(descriptor);
>
> - /* AKPM: buglet - add `i' to tmp! */
> for (i = 0; i < bh->b_size; i += 512) {
> - journal_header_t *tmp = (journal_header_t*)bh->b_data;
> + journal_header_t *tmp = (journal_header_t*)(bh->b_data+i);
> tmp->h_magic = cpu_to_be32(JFS_MAGIC_NUMBER);
> tmp->h_blocktype = cpu_to_be32(JFS_COMMIT_BLOCK);
> tmp->h_sequence = cpu_to_be32(commit_transaction->t_tid);

But I don't think we can _use_ this feature now. Because there are
100000000000 disks out there which didn't implement it.

So why not just remove the loop and do a single write?

2008-01-28 13:18:56

by Jan Kara

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix commit block write in JBD

On Sat 26-01-08 22:02:07, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:09:43 +0100 Jan Kara <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Commit block is expected to have several copies of the header. Fix the
> > bug Andrew has spotted ages ago.
> >
>
> "ages" indeed.
>
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/jbd/commit.c b/fs/jbd/commit.c
> > index 610264b..a69b240 100644
> > --- a/fs/jbd/commit.c
> > +++ b/fs/jbd/commit.c
> > @@ -116,9 +116,8 @@ static int journal_write_commit_record(journal_t *journal,
> >
> > bh = jh2bh(descriptor);
> >
> > - /* AKPM: buglet - add `i' to tmp! */
> > for (i = 0; i < bh->b_size; i += 512) {
> > - journal_header_t *tmp = (journal_header_t*)bh->b_data;
> > + journal_header_t *tmp = (journal_header_t*)(bh->b_data+i);
> > tmp->h_magic = cpu_to_be32(JFS_MAGIC_NUMBER);
> > tmp->h_blocktype = cpu_to_be32(JFS_COMMIT_BLOCK);
> > tmp->h_sequence = cpu_to_be32(commit_transaction->t_tid);
>
> But I don't think we can _use_ this feature now. Because there are
> 100000000000 disks out there which didn't implement it.
> So why not just remove the loop and do a single write?
Yes, but OTOH once the filesystem gets mounted with a new kernel, the
journal gets quickly rewritten and we'll have correct commit blocks there.
But since neither kernel nor e2fsprogs actually check for further sectors
(they check for the header just in the beginning of a block), I agree that
removing the loop completely is probably the best option. Nobody cared so
far so I guess they won't care in future as well. I'll send you a
replacement patch.

Honza
--
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR