Hi!
You encrypt a directory -- sounds easy, right? Support is in 4.4
kernel, my machines run newer kernels than that. Encrypting root would
be hard, but encrypting parts of data partition should be easy.
Ok, lets follow howto... Need to do tune2fs. Right. Aha, still does
not work, looks like I'll need to reboot.
Hmm. Will not boot. Grub no longer recognizes my /data partition, and
that's where new kernels are. Old kernels are in /boot, but those are
now useless. Lets copy new kernel on machine using USB stick. Does not
boot. Fun.
tune2fs on root filesystem is useless, as it is too old. New one
is ... on the data partition. Right. Ok, lets bring newer version of
tune2fs in. "encryption" feature can not be cleared.
Argh! Come on, I did not even create single encrypted directory on the
partition. I want the damn bit to go off, so I can go back to working
configuration. "Old kernels can not read encrypted files" sounds ok,
but "old kernels can not mount filesystem at all" is not acceptable
here :-(.
Is there way to go back? Restoring 400GB from backups would not be fun
:-(.
On a related note, would it be possible to return some kind of error
when encrypted directory is accessed without available keys? I use
unison for backups/sync, and if I ever make a mistake of trying to
sync in non-decrypted state, results would be very very bad...
Thanks,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
On Monday, August 29, 2016 12:08:16 PM CEST Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> You encrypt a directory -- sounds easy, right? Support is in 4.4
> kernel, my machines run newer kernels than that. Encrypting root would
> be hard, but encrypting parts of data partition should be easy.
>
> Ok, lets follow howto... Need to do tune2fs. Right. Aha, still does
> not work, looks like I'll need to reboot.
>
> Hmm. Will not boot. Grub no longer recognizes my /data partition, and
> that's where new kernels are. Old kernels are in /boot, but those are
> now useless. Lets copy new kernel on machine using USB stick. Does not
> boot. Fun.
>
> tune2fs on root filesystem is useless, as it is too old. New one
> is ... on the data partition. Right. Ok, lets bring newer version of
> tune2fs in. "encryption" feature can not be cleared.
>
> Argh! Come on, I did not even create single encrypted directory on the
> partition. I want the damn bit to go off, so I can go back to working
> configuration. "Old kernels can not read encrypted files" sounds ok,
> but "old kernels can not mount filesystem at all" is not acceptable
> here :-(.
>
> Is there way to go back? Restoring 400GB from backups would not be fun
I have not tried it myself, but this should work?
debugfs -w -R "feature -encrypt" /dev/device
(assuming the feature flag is called "encrypt")
Cheers,
Bernd
On Mon 2016-08-29 12:40:24, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> On Monday, August 29, 2016 12:08:16 PM CEST Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > You encrypt a directory -- sounds easy, right? Support is in 4.4
> > kernel, my machines run newer kernels than that. Encrypting root would
> > be hard, but encrypting parts of data partition should be easy.
> >
> > Ok, lets follow howto... Need to do tune2fs. Right. Aha, still does
> > not work, looks like I'll need to reboot.
> >
> > Hmm. Will not boot. Grub no longer recognizes my /data partition, and
> > that's where new kernels are. Old kernels are in /boot, but those are
> > now useless. Lets copy new kernel on machine using USB stick. Does not
> > boot. Fun.
> >
> > tune2fs on root filesystem is useless, as it is too old. New one
> > is ... on the data partition. Right. Ok, lets bring newer version of
> > tune2fs in. "encryption" feature can not be cleared.
> >
> > Argh! Come on, I did not even create single encrypted directory on the
> > partition. I want the damn bit to go off, so I can go back to working
> > configuration. "Old kernels can not read encrypted files" sounds ok,
> > but "old kernels can not mount filesystem at all" is not acceptable
> > here :-(.
> >
> > Is there way to go back? Restoring 400GB from backups would not be fun
>
> I have not tried it myself, but this should work?
>
> debugfs -w -R "feature -encrypt" /dev/device
>
>
> (assuming the feature flag is called "encrypt")
Yes, I figured out debugfs could be used to do this. (But thanks for
the command line). If all tunefs did was to set the bit, this is
safe. Is it?
[I guess I can do fsck -fn, debugfs, fsck -fn; if it passes I should
be safe, if it does not I can turn +encrypt back on, and would be no
worse than I'm now. Hmm?]
Thanks,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
On Mon 2016-08-29 12:49:06, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2016-08-29 12:40:24, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> > On Monday, August 29, 2016 12:08:16 PM CEST Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > You encrypt a directory -- sounds easy, right? Support is in 4.4
> > > kernel, my machines run newer kernels than that. Encrypting root would
> > > be hard, but encrypting parts of data partition should be easy.
> > >
> > > Ok, lets follow howto... Need to do tune2fs. Right. Aha, still does
> > > not work, looks like I'll need to reboot.
> > >
> > > Hmm. Will not boot. Grub no longer recognizes my /data partition, and
> > > that's where new kernels are. Old kernels are in /boot, but those are
> > > now useless. Lets copy new kernel on machine using USB stick. Does not
> > > boot. Fun.
> > >
> > > tune2fs on root filesystem is useless, as it is too old. New one
> > > is ... on the data partition. Right. Ok, lets bring newer version of
> > > tune2fs in. "encryption" feature can not be cleared.
> > >
> > > Argh! Come on, I did not even create single encrypted directory on the
> > > partition. I want the damn bit to go off, so I can go back to working
> > > configuration. "Old kernels can not read encrypted files" sounds ok,
> > > but "old kernels can not mount filesystem at all" is not acceptable
> > > here :-(.
> > >
> > > Is there way to go back? Restoring 400GB from backups would not be fun
> >
> > I have not tried it myself, but this should work?
> >
> > debugfs -w -R "feature -encrypt" /dev/device
> >
> >
> > (assuming the feature flag is called "encrypt")
>
> Yes, I figured out debugfs could be used to do this. (But thanks for
> the command line). If all tunefs did was to set the bit, this is
> safe. Is it?
>
> [I guess I can do fsck -fn, debugfs, fsck -fn; if it passes I should
> be safe, if it does not I can turn +encrypt back on, and would be no
> worse than I'm now. Hmm?]
Ok, done, fsck passed, I'm back to previous configuration.
I guess I was too optimistic. Using ext4 encryption would require at
least new e2fsprogs at the root filesystem, which was something I was
hoping to avoid.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
On Mon 2016-08-29 13:36:55, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2016-08-29 12:49:06, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Mon 2016-08-29 12:40:24, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> > > On Monday, August 29, 2016 12:08:16 PM CEST Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > You encrypt a directory -- sounds easy, right? Support is in 4.4
> > > > kernel, my machines run newer kernels than that. Encrypting root would
> > > > be hard, but encrypting parts of data partition should be easy.
> > > >
> > > > Ok, lets follow howto... Need to do tune2fs. Right. Aha, still does
> > > > not work, looks like I'll need to reboot.
> > > >
> > > > Hmm. Will not boot. Grub no longer recognizes my /data partition, and
> > > > that's where new kernels are. Old kernels are in /boot, but those are
> > > > now useless. Lets copy new kernel on machine using USB stick. Does not
> > > > boot. Fun.
> > > >
> > > > tune2fs on root filesystem is useless, as it is too old. New one
> > > > is ... on the data partition. Right. Ok, lets bring newer version of
> > > > tune2fs in. "encryption" feature can not be cleared.
> > > >
> > > > Argh! Come on, I did not even create single encrypted directory on the
> > > > partition. I want the damn bit to go off, so I can go back to working
> > > > configuration. "Old kernels can not read encrypted files" sounds ok,
> > > > but "old kernels can not mount filesystem at all" is not acceptable
> > > > here :-(.
> > > >
> > > > Is there way to go back? Restoring 400GB from backups would not be fun
> > >
> > > I have not tried it myself, but this should work?
> > >
> > > debugfs -w -R "feature -encrypt" /dev/device
> > >
> > >
> > > (assuming the feature flag is called "encrypt")
> >
> > Yes, I figured out debugfs could be used to do this. (But thanks for
> > the command line). If all tunefs did was to set the bit, this is
> > safe. Is it?
> >
> > [I guess I can do fsck -fn, debugfs, fsck -fn; if it passes I should
> > be safe, if it does not I can turn +encrypt back on, and would be no
> > worse than I'm now. Hmm?]
>
> Ok, done, fsck passed, I'm back to previous configuration.
>
> I guess I was too optimistic. Using ext4 encryption would require at
> least new e2fsprogs at the root filesystem, which was something I was
> hoping to avoid.
I'm trying to make some experiments on USB stick...
Hmm. I guess error handling in add_key should be improved?
pavel@duo:/mnt$ ~/g/e2fsprogs/misc/e4crypt add_key -S salt.txt
Invalid salt: salt.txt
pavel@duo:/mnt$ ~/g/e2fsprogs/misc/e4crypt add_key -S
/media/pavel/8EE9-E39F/salt.txt
EXT4_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_PWSALT: Inappropriate ioctl for device
pavel@duo:/mnt$
(The first one is probably ok, but why it accepts path instead of hex
value?)
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html