2021-02-23 17:44:37

by harshad shirwadkar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] e2fsck: don't ignore return values in e2fsck_rewrite_extent_tree

From: Harshad Shirwadkar <[email protected]>

Don't ignore return values of library function calls in
e2fsck_rewrite_extent_tree.

Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <[email protected]>
---
e2fsck/extents.c | 16 +++++++++-------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/e2fsck/extents.c b/e2fsck/extents.c
index 600dbc97..018737af 100644
--- a/e2fsck/extents.c
+++ b/e2fsck/extents.c
@@ -290,8 +290,10 @@ errcode_t e2fsck_rewrite_extent_tree(e2fsck_t ctx, struct extent_list *list)
errcode_t err;

memset(&inode, 0, sizeof(inode));
- ext2fs_read_inode_full(ctx->fs, list->ino, EXT2_INODE(&inode),
- sizeof(inode));
+ err = ext2fs_read_inode_full(ctx->fs, list->ino, EXT2_INODE(&inode),
+ sizeof(inode));
+ if (err)
+ return err;

/* Skip deleted inodes and inline data files */
if (inode.i_flags & EXT4_INLINE_DATA_FL)
@@ -305,11 +307,11 @@ errcode_t e2fsck_rewrite_extent_tree(e2fsck_t ctx, struct extent_list *list)
&blk_count);
if (err)
return err;
- ext2fs_iblk_set(ctx->fs, EXT2_INODE(&inode), blk_count);
- ext2fs_write_inode_full(ctx->fs, list->ino, EXT2_INODE(&inode),
- sizeof(inode));
-
- return 0;
+ err = ext2fs_iblk_set(ctx->fs, EXT2_INODE(&inode), blk_count);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ return ext2fs_write_inode_full(ctx->fs, list->ino, EXT2_INODE(&inode),
+ sizeof(inode));
}

errcode_t e2fsck_read_extents(e2fsck_t ctx, struct extent_list *extents)
--
2.30.0.617.g56c4b15f3c-goog


2021-02-23 17:44:55

by harshad shirwadkar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] e2fsck: add fallthrough comment in fc replay switch case

From: Harshad Shirwadkar <[email protected]>

During fast commit replay scan phase, in ext4_fc_replay_scan(), we
want to fallthrough in switch case for EXT4_FC_TAG_ADD_RANGE case. Add
a comment for that.

Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <[email protected]>
---
e2fsck/journal.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/e2fsck/journal.c b/e2fsck/journal.c
index 2708942a..a67ef745 100644
--- a/e2fsck/journal.c
+++ b/e2fsck/journal.c
@@ -325,6 +325,7 @@ static int ext4_fc_replay_scan(journal_t *j, struct buffer_head *bh,
ret = JBD2_FC_REPLAY_STOP;
else
ret = JBD2_FC_REPLAY_CONTINUE;
+ /* fallthrough */
case EXT4_FC_TAG_DEL_RANGE:
case EXT4_FC_TAG_LINK:
case EXT4_FC_TAG_UNLINK:
--
2.30.0.617.g56c4b15f3c-goog

2021-02-23 17:46:09

by harshad shirwadkar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] ext2fs: don't ignore return value in ext2fs_count_blocks

From: Harshad Shirwadkar <[email protected]>

Don't ignore return value of ext2fs_get_array() in
ext2fs_count_blocks().

Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <[email protected]>
---
lib/ext2fs/extent.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/extent.c b/lib/ext2fs/extent.c
index 1a87e68b..9e611038 100644
--- a/lib/ext2fs/extent.c
+++ b/lib/ext2fs/extent.c
@@ -1824,8 +1824,11 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_count_blocks(ext2_filsys fs, ext2_ino_t ino,
if (errcode)
goto out;

- ext2fs_get_array(handle->max_depth, sizeof(blk64_t),
- &intermediate_nodes);
+ errcode = ext2fs_get_array(handle->max_depth, sizeof(blk64_t),
+ &intermediate_nodes);
+ if (errcode)
+ goto out;
+
blkcount = handle->level;
while (!errcode) {
if (extent.e_flags & EXT2_EXTENT_FLAGS_LEAF) {
--
2.30.0.617.g56c4b15f3c-goog

2021-02-23 17:46:26

by harshad shirwadkar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] e2fsck: initialize variable before first use in fast commit replay

From: Harshad Shirwadkar <[email protected]>

Initialize ext2fs_ex variable in ext4_fc_replay_scan() before first
use. Also ensure make ext2fs_decode_extent completely overwrite the
extent structure passed to it as argument to prevent potential future
bugs for the users of the function.

Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <[email protected]>
---
e2fsck/journal.c | 2 +-
lib/ext2fs/extent.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/e2fsck/journal.c b/e2fsck/journal.c
index a67ef745..8e7ba819 100644
--- a/e2fsck/journal.c
+++ b/e2fsck/journal.c
@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ static int ext4_fc_replay_scan(journal_t *j, struct buffer_head *bh,
struct ext4_fc_tail *tail;
__u8 *start, *end;
struct ext4_fc_head *head;
- struct ext2fs_extent ext2fs_ex;
+ struct ext2fs_extent ext2fs_ex = {0};

state = &ctx->fc_replay_state;

diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/extent.c b/lib/ext2fs/extent.c
index 9e611038..b324c7b0 100644
--- a/lib/ext2fs/extent.c
+++ b/lib/ext2fs/extent.c
@@ -1797,7 +1797,7 @@ errcode_t ext2fs_decode_extent(struct ext2fs_extent *to, void *addr, int len)
<< 32);
to->e_lblk = ext2fs_le32_to_cpu(from->ee_block);
to->e_len = ext2fs_le16_to_cpu(from->ee_len);
- to->e_flags |= EXT2_EXTENT_FLAGS_LEAF;
+ to->e_flags = EXT2_EXTENT_FLAGS_LEAF;
if (to->e_len > EXT_INIT_MAX_LEN) {
to->e_len -= EXT_INIT_MAX_LEN;
to->e_flags |= EXT2_EXTENT_FLAGS_UNINIT;
--
2.30.0.617.g56c4b15f3c-goog

2021-02-23 18:09:54

by Theodore Ts'o

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] e2fsck: don't ignore return values in e2fsck_rewrite_extent_tree

On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 09:41:53AM -0800, Harshad Shirwadkar wrote:
> From: Harshad Shirwadkar <[email protected]>
>
> Don't ignore return values of library function calls in
> e2fsck_rewrite_extent_tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <[email protected]>

Thanks, I've applied this patch series.

- Ted