Hi,
Thanks for the test tool. It really helps us to very our posix compliance
level.
GlusterFS running as 'ext3' gets:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of
Failed
-------------------------------------------------
/tmp/pjd-fstest-20080402/tests/ch 171 5 2.92% 69 141 145
149
153
Failed 1/184 test scripts, 99.46% okay. 5/1950 subtests failed, 99.74% okay.
Regards,
Amar
-----
> >
> > Very interesting. ocfs2, running as 'ext3' mode, gets:
> >
> > Failed 9/184 test scripts, 95.11% okay. 32/1950 subtests failed, 98.36%
> okay.
>
> That's not bad as a start and it doesn't necessarily mean that there is
> anything wrong with ocfs2. There are many cases when SuS says that the
> behavior can be implementation specific.
>
> But we did find that following ext3 as close as possible will reduce the
> number of bug reports. We started from "574/1950 subtests failed, 70.56%
> okay."
>
> Regards,
> Szaka
>
> --
> NTFS-3G: http://ntfs-3g.org
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> It's the best place to buy or sell services for
> just about anything Open Source.
>
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
> _______________________________________________
> fuse-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fuse-devel
>
>
--
Amar Tumballi
Gluster/GlusterFS Hacker
[bulde on #gluster/irc.gnu.org]
http://www.zresearch.com - Commoditizing Supercomputing and Superstorage!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace