From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
This is needed to test the encryption and casefolding features in
combination.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
---
.../test-appliance/files/root/fs/ext4/cfg/encrypt.exclude | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kvm-xfstests/test-appliance/files/root/fs/ext4/cfg/encrypt.exclude b/kvm-xfstests/test-appliance/files/root/fs/ext4/cfg/encrypt.exclude
index b7f6ea3..20abf5e 100644
--- a/kvm-xfstests/test-appliance/files/root/fs/ext4/cfg/encrypt.exclude
+++ b/kvm-xfstests/test-appliance/files/root/fs/ext4/cfg/encrypt.exclude
@@ -30,9 +30,6 @@ generic/587
generic/600
generic/601
-# encryption doesn't play well with casefold (at least not yet)
-generic/556
-
# generic/204 tests ENOSPC handling; it doesn't correctly
# anticipate the external extended attribute required when
# using a 1k block size
--
2.31.1
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 02:53:00PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
>
> This is needed to test the encryption and casefolding features in
> combination.
Yeah, this is has been on my radar screen, but it's been on my todo
list to submit a patch to generic/556 something like:
if [ "$FSTYP" = "ext4" -a ! -f /sys/fs/ext4/features/encrypted_casefold ]; then
_notrun "ext4 file system does not support encrypted casefold"
fi
before removing generic/556 from the encrypt.exclude list.
I'll probably get to it by this weekend, unless someone beats me to
it.
Cheers,
- Ted