From: Jan Kara Subject: Re: [RFC] Ext3 online defrag Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:55:32 +0200 Message-ID: <20061023145532.GE19623@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> References: <20061023122710.GA12034@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20061023141641.GA29649@thunk.org> <20061023144824.GK3509@schatzie.adilger.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.31.123]:48287 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964909AbWJWOyo (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:54:44 -0400 To: Alex Tomas , Theodore Tso , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061023144824.GK3509@schatzie.adilger.int> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org > On Oct 23, 2006 18:31 +0400, Alex Tomas wrote: > I would make this interface optionally allow the target extent to be > specified, but if target block == 0 then the kernel is free to do its > own allocation. That's a good idea! I'll change the handling so that if block==0 we just allocate blocks of given extent as we wish... Honza -- Jan Kara SuSE CR Labs