From: Alex Tomas Subject: Re: [RFC] delayed allocation, mballoc, etc Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 20:26:09 +0300 Message-ID: References: <45784CD6.3090501@bull.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Alex Tomas , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from [80.71.248.82] ([80.71.248.82]:54889 "EHLO gw.home.net" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1162561AbWLGR0Y (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2006 12:26:24 -0500 To: Valerie Clement In-Reply-To: <45784CD6.3090501@bull.net> (Valerie Clement's message of "Thu\, 07 Dec 2006 18\:18\:14 +0100") Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org >>>>> Valerie Clement (VC) writes: VC> Alex Tomas wrote: >> Good day, >> >> I'd like to ask the community to discuss and review few things >> I've been working on. we propose set of patches with intention >> to improve performance of ext4: >> >> * mballoc v4 >> VC> Hi Alex, VC> I retrieved the patches from your site and began to have a look at them. VC> I found some issues in the ext4-mballoc patch concerning the 48bit VC> physical block number support. VC> The patch in attachment fixes the problem, if I'm not wrong. VC> Regards, thanks for the patch, Valerie! to be honest, I haven't implemented 48bit support in mballoc yet. that would be a next step. thanks, Alex