From: Valerie Clement Subject: Re: [RFC] ext4-locality-groups patch Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:37:12 +0100 Message-ID: <45801018.1090001@bull.net> References: <45800965.2080005@bull.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from ecfrec.frec.bull.fr ([129.183.4.8]:42411 "EHLO ecfrec.frec.bull.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964831AbWLMOjT (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:39:19 -0500 To: Alex Tomas In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org Alex Tomas wrote: >>>>>> Valerie Clement (VC) writes: >=20 > VC> Hi Alex, > VC> I did the following test: > VC> # mkfs /dev/sdc1 > VC> # mount -t ext4dev -o extents,mballoc,delalloc /dev/sdc1 /test > VC> # dumpe2fs -h /dev/sdc1 > VC> # cp linux.tar /test > VC> # tar xf /test/linux.tar > VC> # dumpe2fs -h /dev/sdc1 >=20 > VC> The "Free blocks" and "Free inodes" counters in the dumpe2fs out= put > VC> did not change after running the cp and tar commands. >=20 > sync should help, I think. No, I've just tried, it does not change anything. Val=E9rie >=20 > VC> I think it misses a call to ext4_commit_super() at the end of th= e > VC> ext4_lg_sync_inodes function. > VC> Am I right ? >=20 > what for? allocation was delayed, no blocks were allocated. >=20 > thanks, Alex >=20