From: Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: [RFC] ext4-locality-groups patch Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:40:14 -0600 Message-ID: <458010CE.6020402@redhat.com> References: <45800965.2080005@bull.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Valerie Clement , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:60645 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964956AbWLMOsK (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:48:10 -0500 To: Alex Tomas In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org Alex Tomas wrote: >>>>>> Valerie Clement (VC) writes: > > VC> Hi Alex, > VC> I did the following test: > VC> # mkfs /dev/sdc1 > VC> # mount -t ext4dev -o extents,mballoc,delalloc /dev/sdc1 /test > VC> # dumpe2fs -h /dev/sdc1 > VC> # cp linux.tar /test > VC> # tar xf /test/linux.tar > VC> # dumpe2fs -h /dev/sdc1 > > VC> The "Free blocks" and "Free inodes" counters in the dumpe2fs output > VC> did not change after running the cp and tar commands. > > sync should help, I think. This is probably a discrepancy that comes from reading the block device directly, right? Which is not necessarily in sync with the address space for the filesystem. -Eric