From: Paul Jackson Subject: Re: How git affects kernel.org performance Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 17:09:34 -0800 Message-ID: <20070108170934.dafc5b81.pj@sgi.com> References: <1166297434.26330.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1166304080.13548.8.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> <459152B1.9040106@zytor.com> <1168140954.2153.1.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> <45A08269.4050504@zytor.com> <45A083F2.5000000@zytor.com> <20070107085526.GR24090@1wt.eu> <20070107011542.3496bc76.akpm@osdl.org> <20070108030555.GA7289@in.ibm.com> <20070108125819.GA32756@thunk.org> <45A24A65.1070706@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: tytso@mit.edu, suparna@in.ibm.com, akpm@osdl.org, w@1wt.eu, torvalds@osdl.org, hpa@zytor.com, git@vger.kernel.org, nigel@nigel.suspend2.net, warthog9@kernel.org, randy.dunlap@oracle.com, pavel@ucw.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, webmaster@kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from omx1-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.179.11]:48068 "EHLO omx1.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750857AbXAIBLw (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jan 2007 20:11:52 -0500 To: Jeff Garzik In-Reply-To: <45A24A65.1070706@garzik.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org Jeff wrote: > Something I just thought of: ATA and SCSI hard disks do their own > read-ahead. Probably this is wishful thinking on my part, but I would have hoped that most of the read-ahead they did was for stuff that happened to be on the cylinder they were reading anyway. So long as their read-ahead doesn't cause much extra or delayed disk head motion, what does it matter? -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401