From: coly Subject: Re: where is the ext4 git tree ? Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 13:09:19 +0800 Message-ID: <1169960959.18259.0.camel@colyT43.site> References: <1169805918.32648.14.camel@colyT43.site> <45BA24CB.5060501@us.ibm.com> <20070126165119.GC14759@thunk.org> <1169904387.10553.4.camel@colyT43.site> <20070127215327.GA6414@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Theodore Tso Return-path: Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.188]:22963 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932261AbXA1FLK (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Jan 2007 00:11:10 -0500 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id o25so1644012nfa for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:11:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20070127215327.GA6414@thunk.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org Ted: Thank you ! It is clear to me :-) Coly =E5=9C=A8 2007-01-27=E5=85=AD=E7=9A=84 16:53 -0500=EF=BC=8CTheodore Tso= =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 09:26:27PM +0800, coly wrote: > >=20 > > It seems the patch file is based on stable kernel tree, not -mm tre= e. > > Isn't it ? >=20 > Yes, it's based on 2.6.20-rc5. I'm not sure it really makes sense to > use the term "stable kernel tree" as it relates to 2.6, but no, it's > not based off of the -mm tree. =20 >=20 > - Ted