From: Andreas Dilger Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] e2fsprogs: user selectable dup block handling in fsck Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:16:23 -0700 Message-ID: <20070201061623.GU5404@schatzie.adilger.int> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: tytso@mit.edu, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Jim Garlick Return-path: Received: from mail.clusterfs.com ([206.168.112.78]:48765 "EHLO mail.clusterfs.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933294AbXBAGQZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 01:16:25 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Jan 31, 2007 08:24 -0800, Jim Garlick wrote: > @@ -67,7 +68,8 @@ static const char *prompt[] = { > N_("Unlink"), /* 17 */ > N_("Clear HTree index"),/* 18 */ > N_("Recreate"), /* 19 */ > - "", /* 20 */ > + N_("Unlink file for lost+found reconnect in pass 3"), /* 20 */ > > + /* Unlink file for lost+found reconnect in pass 3? */ > + { PR_1D_DISCONNECT_QUESTION, > + "", PROMPT_DISCONNECT, 0 }, Why not use PROMPT_CONNECT ("Connect to lost+found") and then make the question "File with shared blocks found"? Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Principal Software Engineer Cluster File Systems, Inc.