From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: i_version_2_ext4_specific_code Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:30:15 -0500 Message-ID: <20070215173015.GD5285@thunk.org> References: <20070215002218.56944d89.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jean Noel Cordenner , "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" To: Andrew Morton Return-path: Received: from THUNK.ORG ([69.25.196.29]:46426 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030321AbXBORaX (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:30:23 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070215002218.56944d89.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 12:22:18AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > This: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/ext4-patches/2.6.20-ext4-1/broken-out/i_version_2_ext4_specific_code > > has 100% broken whitespace: it uses spaces where there should be hard tabs. > > Please let's not merge anything which does that. Looking at this patch more closely, it looks like the whitespace was damaged by a broken mailer. My apologies, I should have rejected the patch. Jean Noel, if you could resend the patch and make sure that your mailer isn't screwing up whitespace? If necessary just attach it as a text file instead of including it inline. - Ted