From: Valerie Clement Subject: Re: qla2xxx BUG: workqueue leaked lock or atomic Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:22:28 +0100 Message-ID: <45F57034.2020402@bull.net> References: <20070226133153.GC4095@skl-net.de> <20070226182617.GC9968@andrew-vasquezs-computer.local> <20070227101100.GA22572@skl-net.de> <20070227185134.GJ20397@andrew-vasquezs-computer.local> <20070228151829.GI22572@skl-net.de> <20070228153722.GJ22572@skl-net.de> <20070306203952.471218df.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070307170955.GA4252@skl-net.de> <20070307114525.08265c33.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1173297911.3769.3.camel@dyn9047017103.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Andrew Morton , Andre Noll , Theodore Tso , "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" To: cmm@us.ibm.com Return-path: Received: from ecfrec.frec.bull.fr ([129.183.4.8]:57222 "EHLO ecfrec.frec.bull.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030370AbXCLPWu (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:22:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1173297911.3769.3.camel@dyn9047017103.beaverton.ibm.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org Mingming Cao wrote: > On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 11:45 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 18:09:55 +0100 Andre Noll = wrote: >> >>> On 20:39, Andrew Morton wrote: >>>> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:37:22 +0100 Andre Noll wrote: >>>> >>> BTW: Are ext3 filesystem sizes greater than 8T now officially >>> supported? >> I think so, but I don't know how much 16TB testing developers and >> distros are doing - perhaps the linux-ext4 denizens can tell us? >> - >=20 > IBM has done some testing (dbench, fsstress, fsx, tiobench, iozone et= c) > on 10TB ext3, I think RedHat and BULL have done similar test on >8TB > ext3 too. >=20 > Mingming Is there not a problem of backward-compatibility with old kernels? Doesn't we need to handle a new INCOMPAT flag in e2fsprogs and kernel before allowing ext3 filesystems greater than 8T? Val=E9rie